PERFECT Burn Mono Red

by batman69 on 14 July 2010

Main Deck (52 cards)

Planeswalker (1)



Land (17)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

-Minimum Creatures!
-LaVa Spiikes and Lightning Bolts :)
-and a Planeswalker to finish the job!

iZush iZape iZepeat

RATE!RATE!RATE!

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

24
Likes

This deck has been viewed 28,959 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000580

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Extended
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for PERFECT Burn Mono Red

pyromancer's ascension may be good in this

0
Posted 16 July 2010 at 00:27

Permalink

Slows down the rush! Think about, very fastpaced killn deck!

0
Posted 16 July 2010 at 01:06

Permalink

not my style of a burn, however its not terrible. also drop the planeswalker the object of this deck is to clearly burn as fast as possible, drawing that would just slow you down.

0
Posted 17 July 2010 at 23:00

Permalink

Well chand nalaar doesn't have summoning sickness so right away 2 turns ill do 2 damage and on the 3rd ill sack em for the 10 damge, how is it slowing?

and if he is, what can I replace him with?

0
Posted 17 July 2010 at 23:35

Permalink

up to you, valakut (land) would be a good call in there somewhere, though sence your not running with 60 cards id only put one or two in.

0
Posted 18 July 2010 at 00:49

Permalink

So keep the plainswalker, and add 2 valakuts? Reason I have low card usage so I can draw the right cards faster

0
Posted 18 July 2010 at 01:44

Permalink

Only bad thing about valakut, is that it comes intapped andthat wastes a turn to use, not fast enough for this deck

0
Posted 18 July 2010 at 01:48

Permalink

Heres my version of a short-stack burn.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=77021

0
Posted 18 July 2010 at 05:46

Permalink

def not perfect dude lol. its 52 cards. i hate when my friends play w decks like this.

2
Posted 06 October 2010 at 01:19

Permalink

I think you should play Spark Elemental, Seething Song, Breaking Point
and Burning Wish.

Spark Elemental comes in the first turn and deal 3 damage.
Seeding Song let you play Chandra Nalaar in the 3 turn.
Breaking Point destroy all creatures unless your opponent take 6 damage. Your creatures will be distroyed at the end of turn. So you can clean up the field an play an Elemental to deal damage or your opponent take the 6.
You should play many different cards in your side board to get the right one with burning wish if you need it.

1
Posted 27 January 2011 at 07:09

Permalink

i love breaking point! first time ive seen that card. what reason do you use burning wish for?

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:39

Permalink

Wow I think this is a great deck just as it is! What a great idea!

0
Posted 19 May 2011 at 18:53

Permalink

Assault Strobe would be useful

0
Posted 30 May 2011 at 02:27

Permalink

- 2 Hellspark Elementals
+ 2 Spark Elemental
+ 1 Mountain
+ 2 Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle
+ 2 Leylines of Punishment (2 more in your Sideboard)
+ 3 Seething Songs

Some things for your Sideboard would be 2 more Leylines, and 4 Combusts if you find yourself up against a blue and/or white player.

Boom 60 cards (why wouldn't you want it to be 60??)

0
Posted 31 May 2011 at 01:38

Permalink

PS I don't know who you play Magic with but everyone I've ever met that plays won't even play someone who has less than 60 cards. Why? Because 60 IS the minimum; having any less gives you an (unfair) advantage because you have less cards to worry about cluttering up what you want to pull (that's why so many people use thinning.) That being said about the slight unfair advantage, I can't really think of many decks that this would beat (except complete noobs). White rapes this. Blue especially rapes this. Black rapes as well. Green can rape it pretty easily.

Is this some kind of weird 52 card Red VS Red deck?

0
Posted 31 May 2011 at 19:02

Permalink

lol budd dont worry bout this deck, i do have a finished 60 card deck, and this was my first, i ttoally didnt get to finish it and i forgot about it lol, i do play 60 card dont worry, take a look at my most recent deck called "Quest for the Holy Battle Cry" id like to hear your opinion on it

0
Posted 31 May 2011 at 21:17

Permalink

actually i would play this with a mill deck and that has wall of frost and the 1/6 crab from innistrad anlong with 4 negate and mana leak i wouldnt think it would have a problem vrs this deck due to ols cards like spreading seas and, shifting terrain

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 07:56

Permalink

A nice card to add to this burn deck could be fire servant, that would double the damage you deal to other players.

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 15:02

Permalink

I would add goblin guide and hellspark elemental.

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 16:10

Permalink

Ravnica lands. I like that.

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 22:28

Permalink

I've got four of that art in foil. :]

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 09:37

Permalink

Nice! My favorite Ravnica land is that swamp by Stephan Martiniere, number 295. I've got two foil, and damn they look good. :D

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 23:56

Permalink

Perfect, you say. Uh, right.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 04:46

Permalink

not perfect not even close try kiln fiend. chandra's spitfire. charmbreaker devils.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 04:50

Permalink

* According to the poster, he never got to actually finih putting this deck together, and forgot he was in the process of making it. Based on the 52 cards that are in it, i think it would be pretty good, depending on what else he puts in. id def say some fetch lands, if you want to include like 1 or 2 high drop creatures, id say balefire dragon, mostly because it does wipe the field very often and kills: every titan, steel helkite, almost all illusions, wormcoil, batterskull, thrun, geist, bladehold and many other hard to get of creatures that your opponent controls, IF it gets through, which it usually does/ should, its a severlely underplayed mythic rare, which i see as having potential.

No valakut: Enters tapped; by the time you hit turn 6, the enemy should be killed, and even if not, the 3 damage each mountain entering the field is just ehhhhhh that late in the game.

Grim lavamancers are nice, exile your graveyard for burn pokes, your choice there, id rather play the instant of sorcery spell though for the same cost, maybe 2 of them?

SCRAMBLEVERSE FOR TEH LOLS

Galvanoth, 1 or 2 of those would be nice

And that is all i could really say about this

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 05:33

Permalink

i don't know if this will work but you could use sundial of the infinate. if it does work like i think it does you wouldn't loose your creatures =) and still do insane damage.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 06:00

Permalink

Sundial is very confusing and I made the same mistake at 1st. The problem is Hell spark and ball lighting trigger at the end of every endstep because it is printed on the card. So you will be able save it on your turn but will have to sacrifice it on your opponents endstep.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 08:55

Permalink

Mursh has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 November 2011 at 10:24

Permalink

Nope I believe it removes the triggered delay effect from the stack. The creatures should stay forever after you sun dial just once.

0
Posted 07 November 2011 at 20:42

Permalink

If Sundial of the Infinite's ability is activated before the end step, any "at the beginning of the end step"-triggered abilities won't get the chance to trigger that turn because the end step is skipped. Those abilities will trigger at the beginning of the end step of the next turn. The same is true of abilities that trigger at the beginning of other phases or steps (except upkeep).

official ruling....

0
Posted 11 November 2011 at 22:30

Permalink

4 Spark Elemental and 4 Burst Lightning? Inferno Titan to replace Chandra and a Flame Slash, then add a Valakut and 2 Mountains? Valakut is good in moono red, because if you do need that extra damage, you can just play a Mountian since they can't be countered, unlike the spells, which can be.

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 09:44

Permalink

i like how fast it is, but i dont like lots of creatures....unless its varchilds war riders;)

check this out, burn deck with varchilds: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=215826

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 12:08

Permalink

8 more cards man make it a deck !

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 19:31

Permalink

koth of teh hammerz

0
Posted 06 November 2011 at 20:49

Permalink

natzito has deleted this comment.

Posted 06 November 2011 at 22:04

Permalink

I think Nalaar's a bit expensive for this deck. By that point you should be in very good shape, and if you're not then chandra's not really going to help. I think ablaze would be better, since this is a very instant/sorcery oriented deck.

1
Posted 06 November 2011 at 22:56

Permalink

perfect? leyline

0
Posted 07 November 2011 at 00:21

Permalink

Well I find intersting that you say its a perfect deck when you dont have lots of solid turn two win condition no hate there ...Go take a look at mine I find it way more efficient because of the peaks and the aggro ... Good job anyways !

0
Posted 07 November 2011 at 04:27

Permalink

Well I find intersting that you say its a perfect deck when you dont have lots of solid turn two win condition no hate there ...Go take a look at mine I find it way more efficient because of the peaks and the aggro ... Good job anyways !

0
Posted 07 November 2011 at 04:28

Permalink

can a burn deck really end it on turn two??

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:48

Permalink

That's a really nice deck.

Please check an comment mine: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=230572

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 12:03

Permalink

Tallyaeon has deleted this comment.

Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:21

Permalink

May want to reconsider "Brow Beat" for something more reliable. It's got weird rulings where it only does 5dmg if an opponent chooses to take the 5dmg. If no one does the target draws 3 cards instead. : /

just something to think about.


*fixed

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:23

Permalink

Maybe add in Seething Songs or other mana source spells for faster play / tons of damage :3

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:24

Permalink

Same thing with Blazing Salvo as with Brow beat. It doesn't do both dmg to creature and dmg to player. It only does the 5dmg to player if and only if the player chooses to take it, otherwise it just does dmg to the creature.

Also Flame Slash is creature target only. From what I've seen so far this is a pretty shoddy built burn deck : / I've seen WAY better and played against WAY better. Should seriously reconsider some of those spells.

0
Posted 08 November 2011 at 22:28

Permalink

No Chain Lightnings and Rift Bolts?

1
Posted 09 November 2011 at 11:30

Permalink

ummm.... you're kind of missing 8 cards. You know that right??? Can't play with less than 60.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 21:33

Permalink

Check out my really awesome mono red. I need some rulings so please help. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=258482

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:19

Permalink

Not even close to perfect.

1
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:44

Permalink

Doesn't a deck require a minimum of 60 cards? I only see 52.

0
Posted 11 November 2011 at 01:22

Permalink

You should add fire servant to this deck.

0
Posted 12 November 2011 at 08:20

Permalink

wrong chandra u want ablaze

0
Posted 17 November 2011 at 02:07

Permalink

im a fan of burn decks myself=] check out a few of mine......i need criticism......its a very good deck if i might add

0
Posted 09 November 2012 at 03:33

Permalink

Nivmagus elemental would really help esspecially if its a rush deck, but you would need lower mana costs for it.

0
Posted 28 May 2013 at 14:00

Permalink

This is a good deck but i would take out the planeswalker definitely. put 3 more lands in 4 spark elementals and 2 more elemental apparel to make this a fast fast legal red deck. also i would replace the war elementals with something faster maybe put in goblin arsonist then replace the browbeats with goblin grenades to sac the arsonist and do 6 damage to a player

0
Posted 07 August 2013 at 02:04

Permalink