Hot Puppies (Hound Tribal)

by Mercedes on 03 August 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (3 cards)

Creatures (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

I have no idea why, it was very spontaneous and definitely not the best it can be. LOL If I was to take this more seriously, there'd likely be Jackal Pups and more burn spells. Not to mention a sideboard.

Possible additions or switches: Fiery Hellhound, Boros Mastif, Immolating Souleater, Jackal familiar, Jackal Pup, Lightening Hounds. There's a handful of others, but they aren't as attractive.

Deck Tags

  • Tribal

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 6,674 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1800260

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Hot Puppies (Hound Tribal)

I like it! I wasn't even sure if a hound deck was possible since there are alot of hounds, but they are mostly spread out.

0
Posted 13 September 2012 at 19:40

Permalink

Oh, it's possible, but you have to be prepared to do damage to yourself. Like I said, I SHOULD be running Jackal Pup, but his damage is pretty constant. ^.^ It's the reason I skipped running 4 Lava Hounds. lol

Thanks for the commment! :D It was fun to make.

0
Posted 14 September 2012 at 13:38

Permalink

Why not hellfire mongrel instead of Lava Hounds? Fiery Hellhounds also makes for a nice win con.

0
Posted 21 September 2012 at 01:57

Permalink

Against more decks, Hellfire Mongrel's ability isn't going to be of much use. However, he'd be good sideboard tech against those decks that DO empty their hands. :D And firebreathing is only a win -con if you can hit with it. The Sparring Collars COULD help keep it alive against a lot of things. It's definitely a possibility, I suppose!

0
Posted 21 September 2012 at 13:21

Permalink