The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
This deck has been viewed 1,004 times.
*Insert random comment about "wub" "wub" being dubstep here*On a more serious note, I think your deck lacks focus. By that I mean you got too many singletons and 2-of's. I think you will find it beneficial to cut some of those and add some more sweepers/removal/counterspells. Other than that it looks pretty interresting.
Permalink
Thanks for constructive criticism, Chiligyro! I'll think about making some changes in this deck. You can also suggest me, what concretely should I add.
Personally I would do the following:-1 Ugin-1 Council of the Absolute-1 Grand Arbiter Augusting IV-1 Massacre Wurm-1 Liliana, Heretical Healer-2 Eidolon of Rhetoric-1 Languish-1 Wrath of God-4 Dakra Mystic-3 Aegis of Gods-2 Gitaxian Probe-2 Ojutai's Command+4 Supreme Verdict (strictly better sweeper with the colours you have access to)+2 Narset (It is better to simply focus on 1 planeswalker than 3 different, and Narset is in my opinion the best for this deck)+2 Dragonlord Oujtai (You need a finisher, I think the dragonlord is the most solid option here, so I bumped his numbers)+4 Sea Gate Oracle (Here for their effect as a speed bump, and draws you a card)+1 Go for the Throat (Rounding out the numbers)+1 Mana Leak (Rounding out the numbers)+2 Utter End (Rounding out the numbers)+4 Wall of Omens (Replacing the Dakra Mystics, they draw you a card and are excellent speed bump)The Reason Dakra mystic is bad is pretty simple, it draws your opponent cards, which is bad, so I decided to completely cut it.These changes leans the deck towards heavy control as opposed to what it was before.While completely changing most of the deck makes it lose some of the flavour you put into it I am speaking strictly from an efficiency standpoint. As long as you have fun playing the deck it is all that matters. Some of the cards that got cut could easily see sideboard play, so instead of cramming all you want into the maindeck and come out as an unfocused deck, it is better to streamline the maindeck and add answers to different problems in the sideboard. (in my personal opinion)
This is less a control deck and more a hatebear deck with how it's put together.
Control deck can be hatebear too :P
They're vastly different actually. Hatebear is a more creature oriented build that prevents anything your opponent does from working as it should. Fetch lands not working, abilities not activating, cards costing more to cast, etc. Whereas control is more instant and few if any creatures at all, and is not letting your opponent even get a presence on the board at all. If a control deck says "no", then you ain't casting shit. They're very different deck types
Did someone say control??? Wub wub.
A more irregular version of a control deck would be my enchantment control. Look at it on this account.
Nice one dagger. I wouldn't mind taking that for a spin
Thanks. I just upped the sigil amount to two as it is the only real win con.
good plan. always a good idea