The Giant's Treasure

by s0rinmark0v on 28 July 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Creatures (3)


Sorceries (4)


Instants (2)

Fog2xFog

Artifacts (3)


Sideboard (11 cards)

Sorceries (2)


Enchantments (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A deck that I have resently developed for Borborygmos Enraged and Treasure Hunt.
Based around keeping a hand of 15+ lands and discarding for Borborygmos

Please note: This was made out of cards that I had on hand. I am still missing 1 Borborygmos, 2 Reliquary Tower and the Quicksilver Amulets. I am also a casual player who can't go out and buy a lot of cards

How to Play

Drop something like Reliquary Tower fast, then get a massive hand with Treasure Hunt and use Quicksliver Amulet to play Borborygmos. Then discard X lands to deal 3X damage where X is a number so great that they rage-quit on life

Deck Tags

  • Modern
  • Discard
  • Land
  • Budget

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

41
Likes

This deck has been viewed 5,998 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

04068

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for The Giant's Treasure

Dang! I've seen this before ..... but not as developed ...

Fear the $2 deck!

1
Posted 29 July 2014 at 00:09

Permalink

Yeah. I based it off an older design of mine that didn't look that good.
It works pretty well too, but I am still missing 1 Borborygmos and 3 Reliquary
The worst part is the fact that it's under $20.

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 00:11

Permalink

Man ... you have seen the 2$ deck northy made, right ... Borborygymos is amazing!

IF you had a bit more cash, would you consider courser of kruphix or oracle of mul daya?

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 00:13

Permalink

Yes and no... The idea is lands in the hand while the land on the field is a good idea
I'll sideboard Kruphix for now

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 00:19

Permalink

No ... I mean, you could benefit from something allowing you to play more than one land a turn ... like fastbond. On turn 3 you could have Borborygmos out.

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 00:23

Permalink

Although the deck needs ramp badly, and playing multiple lands is the best way to go about it... Fastbond is so broken it's restricted in Vintage

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 00:04

Permalink

Lol. Oh well ... it was worth a shot.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 03:13

Permalink

guys go see my new deck heliod's army #tokens

-1
Posted 16 August 2014 at 17:51

Permalink

what about summer bloom?

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 06:27

Permalink

I've now added some into the SB

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 22:37

Permalink

Otherwise this is definitely a dangerous deck, but I just wonder that can this keep alive against aggro deck until you have a chance to play Borborygmos?

Also, now I want to create Borborygmos Enraged EDH...

1
Posted 29 July 2014 at 07:33

Permalink

Surprisingly, it has worked up against a B/W Heroic but only just in some cases

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 22:36

Permalink

Wait, that's R/W Heroic...
Wrong colour

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 00:00

Permalink

northy that could be a fun edh I want to see it

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 02:51

Permalink

Creeping renaissance for edh borborygmos enraged deck.

0
Posted 02 August 2014 at 06:15

Permalink

Also burning tree emissary, rubblebelt raiders, deus of calamity, voyaging satyr and nykhos help massively with mana ramp in that kind of deck. Have a modern deck using that combo.

0
Posted 02 August 2014 at 06:16

Permalink

Agreed. Ramp is good for Mr. Borborygmos ... he costs a tad more than the other awesome guild leaders ... like rakdos, lord of riots and lasav, dimid mastermind.

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:07

Permalink

6 acceleration spells in a 60 card deck to drop an 8-drop? Seriously?

On turn 6- I know I haven't done anything yet this game, but I have you now! ~Countered~

Add Desperate Rituals and Through the Breach. Or just Through the Breach. Or Summer Blooms. Or Azusa. Or something

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 23:30

Permalink

I have tried it with more mana rampers and it doesn't work as well with Treasure Hunt. If you have an idea for something that makes more mana than Zhur-Taa, then please let me know!

Believe me, it works pretty well

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 23:39

Permalink

What turn do you normally get a Boryborygmos out? And have you tried playing against any kind of reactive deck?

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 23:59

Permalink

I've versed R/W heroic since I made this revised version.
He normally makes an appearance in turns 5 to 7. The problem that I've had with this deck with more ramp, is that I can't use Treasure Hunt effectively and I conly reveal about 3-5 cards at a time. I then have less lands to discard and ultimately loose

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 00:03

Permalink

I understand that. The best way to ramp for the least amount of deck dilution is a card that lets you play multiple lands per turn. The very best is Azusa, but I understand this is a budget deck. However without this type of effect the deck is really not going to run smoothly. Journey of Discovery, Summer Bloom, Fertilid, and Hunting Wilds all come to mind. These would be played instead of the mana ramp now.

Also that must have been a terrible R/W heroic deck if it couldn't win before then. You literally have no interaction until you finally drop Bory other than 2 life off of Verdant Haven and 2 copies of Fog.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 00:14

Permalink

That deck is designed for a Prince (Peasant) League and there wasn't much heroic or playing being done. This was also done using cards that I had at home in about 10 minutes

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 03:03

Permalink

Would urban evolution help at all? Getting the draw as well as playing that extra land. Btw my friend built a borborygmos enraged edh deck. Will get the list off him if you want to look for ideas. Cool deck btw.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 12:26

Permalink

Surprisingly, this deck loses pretty easy. I should know! I beat it frequently!

Nothing against the deck. Just saying.

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 23:32

Permalink

YOU haven't versed this deck yet!

0
Posted 29 July 2014 at 23:38

Permalink

May I remind you of those 2 games we had with my Leaders of the Pack?
Where you got completely destroyed? (Good times)

Oh, yea- World 6 Boss on Boshy!

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 02:32

Permalink

That never happened...
I have only versed your Leaders of the Pack with MY Leaders of the Pack

And congrats.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 03:01

Permalink

Course you forget when I beat you. Only you.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:50

Permalink

Hahaha

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:51

Permalink

I don't remember because it never happened

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 00:01

Permalink

The mind of someone who lost?

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 23:39

Permalink

Seismic Assault could be a better replacement for Borborygmos Enraged. It would be faster to play plus, it could start damaging before Borborygmos Enraged hits play.

3
Posted 30 July 2014 at 02:25

Permalink

He's right. Do consider it.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 02:32

Permalink

Both could work. Is there something that it could replace in here? I would like to have both in here

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 02:58

Permalink

I would say being a budget deck, I would take out Verdant Haven for Seismic Assault and then run four Evolving Wilds for basic mana search, it would also help thin out the deck for better draws, only downside is they come into play tapped. You could also maybe run Satyr Hedonist instead of Zhur-Taa Druid for sacrificing to play Seismic Assault easier or Borborygmos Enraged for the additional three mana for it's casting cost.

2
Posted 30 July 2014 at 04:53

Permalink

He could work faster... What if I run 2 of each?

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 05:01

Permalink

would definitely work better with fetch lands

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 05:03

Permalink

Is everyone ignoring the "lands in the hand" part of this deck? Or is it just me?

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 05:05

Permalink

fetch lands will work for enraged ability but before u get him out they will help make sure you have the right colors

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 05:07

Permalink

Theoretically, I have all the types of land I need thanks to Treasure Hunt...
But I can add them in for the 1/500 game where I don't get that land

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 05:10

Permalink

It's Okay Sorin ... a lot of people on the vault seem obsessed with fetchlands. I've got SO many comments, even on decks with excellent mana bases. Unless it's a mono-colored deck, someone suggests I add fetchlands.

Personally ... I think a better option for getting the right mana might be running a blue/red version of this deck, minus Borborygmos and with Seismic Assault. Two colors would ensure you get what you need, but ...

... Treasure Hunt and Zhur-Taa Druid seem to solve most mana issues you would conceivably have.

Gruul Turf and similar cards might be a good choice for this deck, since they result in no tempo loss if you play them on tapped lands, and give back a basic land for sacking.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 06:04

Permalink

fetch lands don't just fetch land in a 60 card deck they also thin your deck by 2 cards every time u pull 1 that helps u get the cards u want w/o getting to much land

-1
Posted 30 July 2014 at 06:27

Permalink

Hmm ... so they help fetch the specific land you need. And they also slightly increase the chances of getting a non-land card, since 1 more card than normal is taken out of your deck.

On the other hand, most fetch lands bring in tapped lands (that's a loss of tempo). Also, the best time to use them is after you are assured of having the lands you need ... and in the meantime, fetchlands aren't the best at producing mana themselves.

Certain abilities benefit from fetchlands (landfall, etc.) and certain abilities will screw them over (ob nixilius, archive trap, etc.).

Overall, I think it is mostly a matter of preference whether one uses them or not.

This deck is one that could truly benefit from them, since there are so many lands. They could also serve as cannon fodder for Mr. Borborygmos or Gruul Turf (latter not here yet).

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 07:41

Permalink

Fetch lands thinning the deck to help card draw is already proven a myth as it doesn't increase your odds by any more than 1% till turn 16. The ONLY reason to run fetches is to help with mana fixing, which this deck def can use...

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 14:53

Permalink

Hmm ... so the thinning is so slight it doesn't truly matter. Not surprising.

If I was to mana fix ... I would bring some abundant growths, and a whole load of gruul turf and company. Those lands tend to to cost much, and they have the added benefit of bouncing a land back to one's hand ... perfect fodder for Mr. Borborygmos.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 16:08

Permalink

Since this is a casual deck it doesn't matter. And statistically, yes it only increases card advantage by a percent or so, however, I can't tell you how many games I've lost simply because I kept top decking land when what I needed was literally anything but more land.
The numbers seem miniscule and math certainly doesn't lie, however if I play three fetches on turns 1-3, boom, that's 6 land gone from my mana base in my deck and odds are good that I will get what I need. Numbers don't lie, but neither do the hundreds of games I've grinded out playing both with and without fetches.
After all, we're only human and there is such a thing as luck of the draw. Fetches, the ones that bring land in untapped, are good in every format they're played in because of that reason. Fixing mana like crazy and adding card advantage.
Mathmatically the numbers are so low as to be completely irrelevant, however, based on personal experience I can tell you that the impact is actually much larger than you might think.
That being said they are insanely expensive and are completely unnecessary for this deck.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 18:42

Permalink

I would like to maybe move it on eventually, but Fetchlands are next to useless in here...
While people are OBSESSED with me getting lands on the field, that's the EXACT OPPOSITE of what I want to do. I wan my lands in my hand so I can discard them for Borborygmos! It is rare for me to not have a land that I need, and the moments I do, I have Treasure Hunt to deal with it.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:39

Permalink

That's exactly why gruul turf is awesome here! Those cards are dirt cheap (because people hate on them) and are amazing here.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:51

Permalink

Have you considered Abundance? Could help you find a Fog or Treasure Hunt in a pinch

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 06:18

Permalink

Soothsaying might be good too

1
Posted 30 July 2014 at 11:11

Permalink

Hey wolves in snow! Long time no see!

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 16:05

Permalink

And yet again a deck that runs the plain Fog instead of one of the other really good variants. In this case I would strongly recommend either Moment's Peace or Constant Mists.

Verdant Haven should probably be Overgrowth.

Zhur-Ta Druid should probably be Werebear.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 16:37

Permalink

And Borborygmos should probably be Seismic Assault.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 18:16

Permalink

yes but then you would have a straight combo deck and I doubt he wants that.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 18:50

Permalink

The deck was designed for Borborygmos!

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:42

Permalink

Overgrowth could work...
I'm using Verdant because that's all I have at the moment

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:43

Permalink

Whoops ... forgot to add a sarcastic smile there ....

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:54

Permalink

I feel like Explore is your friend.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 18:09

Permalink

Really? Then why hasn't NASA launched a manned mission to mars yet? XD

Don't worry, I know it's not really NASA's fault. Congress makes the budgets (and cuts funding to projects), but nobody seems to point fingers at them ...

Aside from that ... explore would be a good idea here.

1
Posted 30 July 2014 at 18:13

Permalink

Yeah. I'm seeing it in the SB though.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:45

Permalink

The sideboard isn't for cards that *maybe* should be in the deck. Cards either are in or out. Sideboards are for cards that beat a certain match-up, or cards that replace main-board cards that are bad against a certain match-up. They are always chosen with a specific deck or class of decks in mind. I think Explore should either be main or not at all.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 22:24

Permalink

What about Dragon Arch? would allow you to put out Borborygmos for 2 instead of 8. And agree with Overgrowth instead of Verdant Haven. Otherwise, I really like the idea behind this deck! +1 from me

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 20:10

Permalink

I don't understand why you use Verdant Haven for example... ...what does it do for you other then lowering the chanse of getting Borborygmos??

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 21:25

Permalink

Fixes colors and mana ramps. Verdant haven adds one of any color in addition to the mana added by the land.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 22:06

Permalink

For 3 mana, I gain 2 life and a land producing 2 mana
Therefore, more lands in hand = bigger Borborygmos damage

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:46

Permalink

Since the Haven only produces a single mana and could have been a land, too, there really is no advantage besides the 2 life and some acceleration because it doesn't cost a land drop. However, that's a small gain. Too small considering that you
a) risk that you lose 2 cards at once if the opponent takes out the land
b) you stop a Treasure Hunt if it runs into a Haven <= This, btw, means FEWER Borborgymos damage!

Same is true for the Druids. Of course, in order to get Borborgymos into play you have to have some mana acceleration. But it should produce more than one mana or have other uses as well. That's why I suggested Werebear and Overgrowth.

2
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:54

Permalink

Puschkin is totally right...

2
Posted 31 July 2014 at 11:57

Permalink

He generally is ...

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:07

Permalink

This deck seems pretty terrible. I don't think this could win against anything.. Your just not doing anything for turns and turns untill you can TRY to cast a Borb... I'm not sure what suggestions to give, because this thing needs A LOT of work..

On the other hand, I had been playing a deck utilizing Borborygmos a while back in Modern with decent success.

http://www.mtgvault.com/alleywayjack/decks/modern-ooze-reanimator/

It's a completely different take on breaking Borborygmos, but it actually works really well.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 22:21

Permalink

Casual decks do that sometimes.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 22:31

Permalink

Yeah i guess. I mean, i play casual with some of my buddies who aren't into competitive/ tournament magic and we all have great games. No one builds, or tries to play decks that literally do nothing for 5 turns. That just seems silly. I guess a gimmicky idea is cool, but this just isn't thought out, or effective at all.

I'm not trying to be rude.. but i guess i'm probably coming off like an asshole. I don't know. Oh well.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 22:40

Permalink

Happens. A few people have already suggested seismic assault and a couple other things, which would make the deck somewhat viable. It's just an idea of playing a big dude and discarding your hand to win.

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:05

Permalink

Why not play seismic assault as well? I don't know.

All I know is that this deck seems slow to me, and I play white angels. That's a problem.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:57

Permalink

I'd now like to point out several things about this deck that everyone seems to be forgetting:
1) This is a deck for Borborgymos Enraged and Treasure Hunt
2) I need my lands in the hand. No point suggesting stuff like Fetchlands when you should be saying stuff like "Replace Zhur-Taa Druid with Llanowar Elves"
3) If you really want to see a Seismic Assault version, HERE IT IS!
http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/groundbreaking-discovery/

I am just getting a little tired of reading "Take out Borborygmos" and "Add Fetchlands" and "You need this that says play extra lands". While the extra lands on the field may get Borborygmos out faster, that's 3 damage that I've lost.

There is a reason that there is a "Read the Description" and "How to Play" on these decks. It is for people to go: "Oh, that's what the deck is about" not for people to ignore and completely change what a deck is about

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:55

Permalink

You only need to discard 7 lands to kill. I think playing extra lands in a turn, in a 40+ land deck is gonna be ok.......

0
Posted 30 July 2014 at 23:58

Permalink

Not my point.
The games I've had. I struggle to have the required lands (maybe because I only own 1 Reliquary Tower...) to win. And lands on the field may not help me at the moment

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 00:03

Permalink

I completely see your point, and yes I did read Deck Description and How to Play. I just thought that Seismic Assault could be an added bonus before Borborgymos Enraged hits the field for creature removal, damage and whatnot. I do like how the deck is set up but, an idea I could give you is defense is always key so, maybe add some lands that add as creatures incase of fast games such as: Mutavault, Faerie Conclave, Treetop Village, Dryad Arbor, and Raging Ravine, tried to keep it with the colors you are running. They could help out with damage, blocking if needed and being lands still can feed to Borborgymos for the three damage when discarded.

2
Posted 31 July 2014 at 01:53

Permalink

I didn't think about that...
How many of them are dirt cheap? They would make a nice alternate win-con.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 02:08

Permalink

Faerie Conclave, Treetop Village run a couple bucks. I think Dryad Arbor and Raging Ravine are between five to six. Mutavault is still the pricey one there is also Khalni Garden tosses out a 0/1 its cheap. There is also cards such as Halimar Depths (scry 3 land), Quicksand (kills small attacking creature), Sejiri Steppe (adds white but, protects Borborgymos Enraged that turn from color of your choice) these lands are all pretty cheap as well in price.

2
Posted 31 July 2014 at 02:17

Permalink

They are suggesting fetch lands because you are running a 3 colour deck with just basic lands that that needs both blu eand green man as early as possible.

Also, whether you fetch them or not and whether you play them within 4 or 7 turns, you WILL need 7 mana to cast Borborgymos! That's 7 lands in play or a mix of land-substitutes like Haven or your Druids. And as long as those substitutes produce a single mana, it doesn't really matter if they are lands or not. 7 cards are seven cards, dude.

And to combat that you need mana sources that produce more than one. Could be lands as well. Have a look at Sandstone Needle and Hickory Woodlot.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:58

Permalink

Just for fun, fill in the gaps for me:

When I was doing acid, ___ turned into ___.

Upvoting the funniest ones you come up with!
Go here for more - http://www.mtgvault.com/princecooshie101/decks/cards-against-humanity/

-1
Posted 31 July 2014 at 02:04

Permalink

Justin Beiber turned into Hello Kitty giving birth to two midgets shitting in a bucket

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 02:09

Permalink

Dude! That reminds me of my awesome trigonometry teacher.

Sine(x) = Opposite/Adjacent
Cosine(x) = Adjacent/Hypotenuse
Tangent(x) = Opposite/Adjacent

... and the mnemonic device ...

Some Old Hippie
Caught Another Hippie
Tripping On Acid

1
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:11

Permalink

I hate math, but THAT is GOLD!

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 23:40

Permalink

We need more things like that!

HokeyPokey;
Oh, the Pathfinder game is underway. I've posted up the first bit, Wildrceth

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 23:46

Permalink

On it. It appears we are in a bar ... and I have 20 gold to spend. We know what that means ...

0
Posted 06 August 2014 at 00:27

Permalink

Correction. YOU are in a bar. Collamus is in the School of Arcane Arts, studying like a good wizard

1
Posted 06 August 2014 at 00:32

Permalink

Sweet. No elvish egghead around to spoil things. Though one has to wonder what quantity of scholarships enticed an elf to learn magic from humans.

FYI, a talkative elvish archmage would be the most insufferable companion ever. Of all time. It'd be like having the Eldar as allies.

1
Posted 06 August 2014 at 02:47

Permalink

Collamus is human...
But I do see your point. Up-tight elves are the WORST

1
Posted 06 August 2014 at 02:54

Permalink

Collamus is human ....

... oh, we might have a chance at getting along then. I mean, have you seen some of those freaks at Hogwarts. I'm golden compared to a half-giant. :)

0
Posted 06 August 2014 at 03:14

Permalink

Hey s0rin .... I have magic powers too.

http://www.mtgvault.com/knightofthehokeypokey/decks/budget-magic-powers/

0
Posted 06 August 2014 at 03:18

Permalink

Alright, please hear me out.

I do not think fetchlands are much good here, but please consider Gruul Turf.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 06:59

Permalink

I'm a little confused on the deck to be honest, would you mind explaining it a bit better? Also which turn does your combo come down because it seems too slow to compete against modern decks. If you have a moment feel free to check my new modern deck out, its U/W/R tempo and really looks good fun! http://www.mtgvault.com/gothy/decks/uwr-get-wrecked/

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 07:48

Permalink

Get Borbor out, play Treasure Hunt, discard all the lands you draw and hopefully deal enough damage to kill. It's straight forward.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 09:16

Permalink

oh just thought it would be a swifter combo

2
Posted 31 July 2014 at 12:20

Permalink

Maybe consider Elvish Piper, Quicksilver Amulet, or Sneak Attack to cheat the Borborygmos out. You need a way to get him faster since that is your only win condition.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 17:16

Permalink

What is Prince/Peasant league anyway? If I had a better understanding of the format I might be able to suggest more relevant cards.

0
Posted 31 July 2014 at 17:30

Permalink

Peasant/Prince is a deck made out of only commons and uncommons
iThe league part is a posting of match-ups between ALL competitors, similar to a tournament round-robin

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:06

Permalink

How are you playing borby then? He's mythic?

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:53

Permalink

I'm not. For the Prince League I'm in, I'm using a B/W Constellation/Life switch deck that works really well:
http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/taxes-of-nyx/

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:56

Permalink

Well in that case, as a casual should 4 fastbond and 4 gush.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 03:17

Permalink

Done some remodelling to make the deck faster! The main focus now is to lay Quicksilver Amulet to play Borborygmos

2
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:14

Permalink

There we go, that's a change I can get behind.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:31

Permalink

Thank you to berndtoast for the proposed change!

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:33

Permalink

I would run Polymorph and then four Khalni Garden, Faerie Conclave, and Treetop Village instead of Quicksilver Amulet. Then playing Polymorph sacrificing Faerie Conclave, Treetop Village when activated as a creature or the 0/1 plant token produced by Khalni Garden. This would search and play Borborygmos Enraged, being as he is the only true creature in the deck.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:36

Permalink

Feel free to do that in your own version!

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 00:49

Permalink

Done!

http://www.mtgvault.com/clockworkcopper/decks/borborygmos-on-a-stick/

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 01:07

Permalink

Now, I'm gonna have to brew my own version.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 01:20

Permalink

WHAT HAVE I DONE?!?!?!?!?!

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 01:24

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/imfromnasa/decks/bobopolyabundrmorphanceygmos/

There we go. Keeping it Modern. I'll make the SB the legacy version.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 05:29

Permalink

@ s0rinmark0v

You have begun the inevitable ... the creation of decks to put all the guild leaders on a stick ...

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:13

Permalink

Shit.

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:47

Permalink

One thing I noticed doing some sample hands, it's pretty rare that I got an amulet, borby , and a treasure hunt by turn 5. So to increase the odds, I would suggest abundance. It will basically allow to you to fetch a non land every turn. Either that or Ring of 3 wishes.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 02:14

Permalink

Also, have you considered scouting trek? Seems interesting.

2
Posted 01 August 2014 at 02:20

Permalink

the draws r hella clunky but when it works, u win.

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 11:35

Permalink

Wow ... might want to work on the clunky factor then!

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:13

Permalink

I love the deck idea.

I think Polymorph + Man lands / Khalni Garden would get you your Bobo much faster than Quicksilver Amulet. It has the added advantage that you don't actually need to draw Bobo and you could occasionally chump block.

Alternatively you could just go for a regular casting of Bobo with 4 Summer Bloom (cut fog and amulet).
T1: land
T2: land, Summer Bloom, 2-3 land, Treasure Hunt
T3: land, Summer Bloom, 2-3 land, Treasure Hunt
T4: Cast Bobo

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 14:55

Permalink

Dang, that takes a while!

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:14

Permalink

Quicksilver amulet costs 4 to cast and 4 to activate. The earliest the existing deck can get out Bobo is turn 5 and it's vulnerable to artifact removal.

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 01:19

Permalink

I have almost never versed Artifact removal.
For a more tournament play, I would add that land that gives you a 0/1 creature and Polymorph

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 01:28

Permalink

Khalni Garden

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 01:44

Permalink

That one.

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 01:59

Permalink

You could put exploration

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 16:25

Permalink

A Kessig wolf run

0
Posted 01 August 2014 at 16:26

Permalink

said it before ill say it again.....Abundance.....

0
Posted 04 August 2014 at 21:57

Permalink

This deck is a one-hit wonder, right? Because it is easy to end with one well-placed spell, and pretty clunky.

Quicksilver amulet it pretty amazing.

I still think you should add gruul turf.

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:19

Permalink

Yeah. I was thinking about using ALL of those types of lands. Well, on here anyway.
Gruul Turf, Simic Growth Chamber and Izzet Steamworks?

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:42

Permalink

He comes the pain train. ;).

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:44

Permalink

Done. It was actually Izzet Boilerworks

0
Posted 05 August 2014 at 00:45

Permalink

Oracle of Mul Daya and Primeval Titan could be good in this deck as well as Evolving Wilds.

0
Posted 03 February 2015 at 08:34

Permalink

Actually Evolving Wilds wouldn't be good but with the lands that return lands to your hand you could use Oracle to play the top two cards of your library if they are lands then Primeval Titan to bring out two more lands to return the two from Oracle and get an additional 4 mana and two lands for discarding in your hand each turn

0
Posted 03 February 2015 at 20:18

Permalink