Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
This deck has been viewed 1,270 times.
NOTE: Set by owner when deck was made.
I don't understand the point in flooded strand and bloodstained mire, maybe they could be replaced with swamps, plains' or more godless shrines and concealed courtyards. Bar that nice deck.
Permalink
They are cheaper fetch lands that pull unwanted lands from the deck so that 1- you won't draw them mid-late game when you don't need them, and 2- you get a godless or equivalent when you need it early. In general, this mechanic is one of the biggest revolutions in MTG theory, as EVERYONE knows the dread of topdecking a land and thinking, how many more of these bastards are there?!?!?! This helps solve that problem.
Dont have marsh Flats, thats Why.
riight i see, thanks
I love what you're doing here. How does lingering souls work with copter? I assume that's the combo for the copter, but my worry is that it doesn't give enough advantage to justify the spot as its conditional. Personally I go with things like batterskull in that spot, but that's me. Not sure that the deck needs vault of the archangel as 1- the curve in here is so low so you don't need to run 23 lands, 2- hurts your color output in the early game and stops you from the turn 2 sculler or aetherborn, and 3- gives you conditional advantage in the late middle game when you can hold down a creature(s) and have the open mana to maximize it. It does help even out the confidant drain, but with a curve that basically stops cold at 3 my guess would be that 22 lands would be better.I'm not a big fan of the 1 copy of zealous persecution, as its not gunna be consistent enough to count on as a game finisher or a nuke against rush mechanics. Perhaps better in the sideboard? Conditionally its a wonderful card.I have similar thoughts about collective brutality. I prefer the mainboarded blessed alliance, but that's me.I'm not sure how I feel about liliana in here, but ive never given her any play. How does she pilot?All of this being said, I believe wholeheartedly that this mechanical setup can and does work, and I'm overjoyed to see sculler get some action. I love the little guy. In my opinion he shouldn't be as cheap as he is by any means. Good work friend, keep it up.
Thanks for the input, great advise. Did the brewing last night, and are testing the deck on the next FNM. I’m not sure about this Lilian, Liliana of the vail I the “dream walker” here I think.
I completely disagree on the land count. With 2 GQ, Vault and 3 man lands main, 23 lands seems spot on, (obviously Marsh Flats would help, but if you don't own any you use what you have).In lieu of LotV I love the use of Gideon MB, a resolved Ally completely takes over most midrange fights!One minor SB change I would consider is to pull a Blessed Alliance for another Stony, with the amount of potential life gain and proactive cards in the main I doubt Burn will have a decent vin % against you so I'd rather add another proactive card that makes you stronger against Affinity and post SB Eldrazi Tron.Great build, all around!
After the first test i ended 3-1, lost to Skiver, won twice against burn, and won to a u/W control. Going to change the SB, stony is coming om. Thanks for the input!