Kajuata

26 Decks, 178 Comments, 27 Reputation

Are you running on standard? I think someone told me that Intangible Virtue was banned or something. I am not sure.
If you are adding the Drowned Catacomb just in case you may use the flashback choice of the Lingering Souls I would remove an extra island and add 1 more Catacomb. And also, as Midnight Hunting and Lingering souls have the same CMC (but the lingering is a sorcery) I would use 3 and 3.
Otherwise, nice deck. I was thinking in making a deck like this on Legacy with Talrand, its invocations, Pride of the Clouds, some flying walls and maybe Radiant.

0
Posted 09 September 2012 at 15:08 as a comment on Into the Sky, to Live, or Die.

Permalink

Thanks for the comment man. In my original deck I included something similar to the Odric Crusader (Benalish Hero). My problem with that card and even Odric or the Ballyrush is what to remove? If any ideas I am all ears!

0
Posted 05 September 2012 at 03:19 in reply to #287059 on Soldier Avalanche 2.0

Permalink

Nice deck, seems very fast. I asume that your main nuke is the Knotvine. I would try to add some creatures with evasion (like angels) or something that allows the knotvine to attack unblocked such as spirit mantle or angelic benedictions.
I can't seem to understand the whole idea of why using Gideon in here.
If you can check my own UWG exalted deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=358835
Is not restricted as type II, but you might get something usefull.

0
Posted 01 September 2012 at 20:33 as a comment on Bant Exalted

Permalink

Nice, I don`t like that much the idea of having the Hero of Bladehold as is a knight, but the card is to darn good. Also I would prefer the 4 Champions of Parrish instead the 4 Elite Vanguards.

If you can chek my own soldier tibal:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378850

0
Posted 30 August 2012 at 20:56 as a comment on Soldiers

Permalink

Nice, hope it works:
1) White Soldier human deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378850
2) Exalted WUG deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=358835

Really hoping for comments ^^

0
Posted 29 August 2012 at 03:53 as a comment on "YOUR DECK HERE"

Permalink

I would definitly add another winning card than the luminarch, just in case you get the enchantment removed. Just choose a creature you like and add it, I am not familiar with the valid editions for modern but I would try it to have some feedback with my enchantments. Don't you think you bet to much on having four Leylines? Finally if you were considering vintage cards, Oppalesence is a must.

If you happen to have time check on my deck, thanks in advance: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378850

0
Posted 28 August 2012 at 04:20 as a comment on Modern White POWER

Permalink

Thanks for the comment man! I am serioslly considering adding two extra lands, maybe removing 1 Gideon Lawkeeper and 1 Avenger.
I agree with the Capitain vs Darien, but Darien also intimidates the oponent not to attack you, while yhe Capitain doesn't. Finally my mana curve is lowered by the Daru Warchiefs, if you check on Gatherer, Darien also counts as a soldier. Although I must also say that I was thinking in adding two Bellyrush (1W 1/1 kitkin soldier that lowers your soldier spells by 1).
Thanks again and keep the comment comming!

0
Posted 28 August 2012 at 03:22 in reply to #285399 on Soldier Avalanche 2.0

Permalink

Nice deck man. I would remove at least 2 Thalia, as they are legendary. Did you consider Incresing Devotion? Also considering the amount of creatures you put in play won't also be advisable cathars's crusade? Will help you with the counters on champion of lumboldt.

Finally, if you can check my human soldier deck if you can, comments are appreciated:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=378850

1
Posted 27 August 2012 at 03:33 as a comment on Green white human

Permalink

Hi! I have a very similar deck with exalted also. Why didn't you considered angel benedictions? They give you control on what creature can block yours. I know birds can be really useful, but they lack the exalted rule >_<. Finaly, why not ussing the Cathedrals of War? They come tapped, but they have exalted. Consider that.

Well that's it, if you could check my deck I would appreciate it, feel free to comment: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=358835

0
Posted 11 July 2012 at 04:03 as a comment on Exalted

Permalink

Tks! I am thinking in switching the charms for the Hindering Light, and removing the Knotvines for the Quasalis.
The mana curves could be fixed by removing Angels, but I think they are part of the strategy of the deck. The Battelgrace gives me lifelink, Sublime Exalted and the Stoic makes my oponent to think about atacking with more than one creature.

0
Posted 11 July 2012 at 03:41 in reply to #271987 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

Hey man! Nice deck over here. It's quite an expensive deck I must say, mainly because of the lands. As other guys said I would definitely add at least 2 Sublime Archangels. I would also change the Sigiled Paladin for the Knight of Glory (M13), is more mana efficient. Other thing is that I don' understand the role of the Geist, does the exalted activates as other creature (token) is atacking? Besides that it does not fit in the deck. Finally I would add more Finest Hour, and Angelic Benediction seems very good to me.
I have also an exalted deck, with the same colors as you, so try to check out: I am looking for advice http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=358835

0
Posted 11 July 2012 at 02:48 as a comment on ExaltedStoneâ„¢

Permalink

Tks for the comment man! It has been suggested by others (Archangel777), but the problem for me is that they don't have exalted. I am still going to check anyways.

0
Posted 11 July 2012 at 02:41 in reply to #271748 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

Thanks! I've been thinking on removing that glacial fortress and 1 bant charm and adding two extra basic lands (1 island and 1 forest). I am going to make some experiments. Thanks for the comment.

0
Posted 09 July 2012 at 20:19 in reply to #271555 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

The Sublime Archangel is valid on standard as far as I know, so I think is a must on exalted decks. If you have any ideas on how to improve this deck, I am all ears xD

0
Posted 09 July 2012 at 14:39 in reply to #271525 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

Going to check that card, but as I remember it does not have the exalted rule.

0
Posted 09 July 2012 at 14:22 in reply to #271463 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

Counters? +1/+1? Like adding some new ajanis?
Thanks for the comment ^^

0
Posted 09 July 2012 at 14:14 in reply to #271462 on Exalted Deck

Permalink

Haven't you thought about including students of the warefares? They are really good knights and cheap in their CMC

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewCard.aspx?CardName=Student%20of%20Warfare&Edition=ROE

0
Posted 27 June 2012 at 12:55 as a comment on Knights

Permalink

Thanks for the comment ^^. I thought about removing the swords and adding armored acension, as it is a cheaper version. To downside is that it does not grant any protecction or the side effects.
Do you really think I need a romoval like the path to exile as I have the wraths (with my knights exemplars)? If I had to choose a single removal would be sword to plowshares.

0
Posted 27 June 2012 at 12:53 in reply to #267748 on Knights attack!

Permalink

I agree with this guy. Use knights instead of soliders. Nice deck anyways.

I'll gladly apreciate if you could check my own knights deck, coments apreciated:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=327426

0
Posted 24 June 2012 at 20:20 in reply to #266291 on Dark Days White Nights

Permalink

Nice deck, mine is similar, but using mass removals and equips.
I'll gladly apreciate if you could check my own knights deck, coments apreciated:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=327426

0
Posted 24 June 2012 at 20:19 as a comment on Knights

Permalink

141-160 of 166 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last