Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
a slower paced deck utilizing cards to make all opponents lose the game while appearing seemingly innocent Deck utilizes the bottled colisters to avoid any negative effects of haveing 0 cards in your hands while have no instants to play on oppenents turn so losing nothing, sacrificing magus of the jar on your turn with 4 megrims has the potential to do 56 damage to each oppenent in one turn alone, in addition if you had wound reflection out that would double to make for a 56/112/224/448/896 hit to every oppenent. (bc yes in fact wound reflections do stack and resolve one after another) please rate, welcoming any and all tips!
This deck has been viewed 1,142 times.
There are better walls out there that you could use, other than that you have a pretty good stack abuse deck right there. I would however ditch gibbering descent since you would be hellbent and thus skip your upkeep removing your ability to return your cards to your hand. (unless you intend to take the 1 life and discard a card effect, which kind of defeats the point.)
Permalink
well i believe that technically the way it would work is that since they are both my riggered abilites that i would get to place them on the stack in the order i choose, therefore choosing to return my cards, and since the ruling on gibbering says that its the cards in your hand as the upkeep would start, would still allow me to return my cards and forgoe any negative effects of the card. i could be wrong but from reading the rulings this would seem to me how it would work, if anyone has any clearification on how this effects would resolve maily bc they both say "At the beginning of your upkeep" and both being my abilities
Looking at the cards again the hellbent ability says you get no upkeep, meaning that you get no begining of upkeep in which to send the cards back to hand, sorry.
yah but again... both bottled cloister and gibbering are at the begining of your upkeep and are both my abilities should i should be able to order them how i please, and if you read the rulings on gibbering i think it would work, idkbut youd have to read the wording and take into account that two of my cards would resolve at the same time, its confusing and idk how the matchup of the two would work for sure but read the updates on the rulings of gibbering and tell me what you think
"When any instruction is followed in the game, it may match the trigger event of any number of triggered abilities. Each time this happens, the triggered event triggers. When a player is in the process of gaining priority to play spells and abilities, players put any triggered abilities that have triggered onto the stack. First the active player adds all the triggered abilities that he or she controls, in the order of his or her choice, and then the non-active player does so. With multiple non-active players, players go in turn order." "5/1/2007: If you have no cards in hand at the time your upkeep step would start, instead that step is skipped and your draw step starts." maybe im missing something or reading these wrong but it seems to me that it would work
After reading many more rulings i think i have come to the conclusion that this instance of "hellbent" is static and there for is constantly checked, so i will remove this from the deck seeing as it was not an important part but still a nice addition to piss people off, if anyone has information that contradicts this plz let me know as this is an interesting card match up
I like the looks of this deck, I think I might try it out.... Just a couple thoughts... What about trying Forced Fruition and/or Teferi's Puzzle box?