Mazes endless

by SocceroosNInja on 26 June 2013

Main Deck (80 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

this deck will take advantage of multiple guildgates, defenders and damage prevention without using mazes end

How to Play

you need as many guildgates on the field as you can to take advantage of axebane guardian and crackling perimiter to defeat your opponent without playing attacking creatures

Deck Tags

  • Defender
  • guildgate uses
  • Rainbow
  • all guilds
  • Mazes end

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,363 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

2364624

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Mazes endless

Just remember you can't stack crackling perimeters.... Even if you have 2, 3 or 4, you will always do 1 damage per gate, not per enchantment.

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:28

Permalink

i know that but its more getting one out fast, its a chance thing

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:30

Permalink

Ok. I agree the sooner the better. Just making sure is all. Best win con because people see it and go "oh yeah what a stupid enchantment.... " until they start losing life...... and fast :)

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:32

Permalink

its funny to watch them just say, 'oh s***!'

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:36

Permalink

Even funnier - "I tap 2 gates doing 2 damage" "ok whatever" (leave all land open every turn from there on) "ok end of your turn I tap all my land" "oh shit...."

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:39

Permalink

haha, classic

1
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:41

Permalink

Why would you build this and not run Maze's end? not even one?

1
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:41

Permalink

because its trolling other people and it proves that mazes end is just another card. if you can win without it you can save your money

1
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:43

Permalink

Pilainar do you not know how to read? Is it something of a challenge to you? If so we are here to help. Please bring your full attention to the "DESCRIPTION" section of this deck where he clearly states (in plain English I might add) and I quote; "this deck will take advantage of multiple guild gates, defenders and damage prevention WITHOUT using mazes end". Seems like you have your answer there buddy.... If only you had read it first.....

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:49

Permalink

I wasn't bad mouthing the deck I was just wondering why? I understand it was in the description it just seemed odd to me.

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 02:59

Permalink

Just a question; If I put a Detention Sphere on your Crackling Perimeter, cancelling all of them or something similar, what are you going to do, besides a) say "oh, f#*k" yourself and/or b) ragequit???

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 03:48

Permalink

Lol sorinmarkov as if he's going to put all of them on the board at once... Idiot....

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 03:53

Permalink

Detention Sphere prevents them from being played afterwoods. And by removing them completely by using multiple destroy enchantment spells/ abilities. My point is: IF ALL of the perimeters are gone, what next?

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 04:55

Permalink

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You fool, read the ruling on detention sphere.... Maybe you should read the card before saying they do something that it doesn't......... afterwoods, lol...

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:04

Permalink

this is hillarious, just watching the comments roll in from people who think they can beat it with cards that don't do what they think they do

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:06

Permalink

A) I would never play azorius B) What I meant by Detention Sphere preventing them, they become exiled when they enter under the detention sphere rulings, as far as i know.
You still didn't answer the point of the question: No perimeters, what now?

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:11

Permalink

NO. THEY. DO. NOT. READ. THE. RULING. FOR. DETENTION. SPHERE. IT DOES NOT SAY WHEN ANOTHER PERMANENT ENTERS THE BATTLEFIELD EXILE THAT CARD. IT IS ONLY FOR WHATEVER CARD IS ALREADY ON THE BATTLEFIELD. Oh my god seriously...... How hard is it to read a card??? Are you serious or trolling? You HAVE to be trolling because no one can be that stupid....

And in answer to your asinine question, I highly doubt all 4 Crackling perimeters will go unless he gets hit by a slaughter games, in which case he's pretty much fucked... That's what happens when you play a high reward - high risk deck...

SocceroosNinja - Tell me about it, bloody hilarious!!!

1
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:20

Permalink

Do you want me to troll you? 'Cos trolling is a art
And, my confusion is "exile all permanents with the same name as the exiled card"
To me that means: If there is any permanent on the battle field AT ANY TIME with the same name as exiled permanent, they are exiled too!

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:27

Permalink

Wow, you really are stupid..... Please don't ever breed.... PLEASE.

You LITERALLY just answered your own question about the card.

How can you exile a permanent that isn't on the field?

Does it say to exile any future permanents of the same name? no.

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 05:30

Permalink

I DON'T PLAY AZORIUS, AND NEVER WILL JUST THINK ABOUT THE FACT OF GETTING RID OF THE STUPID BARRIER ENCHANTMENTS NOT THE FUCKING DETENTION SPHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 23:42

Permalink

reading coments has never been so much fun. yes this deck is high rick but it works.

1
Posted 26 June 2013 at 23:45

Permalink

SocceroosNinja, this guy is hilarious!!! Doesn't play Azorius yet trying to tell us what a card does from Azorius! CLASSIC!!! If it gets removed who cares? Like ninja and I said, high risk, high reward. You wanna play a safe game? I hear Monopoly is nice...

1
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:01

Permalink

I would have Maze's End as a sideboard, seriously, think about it. Look for alternatives!

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:03

Permalink

Nah bro, too mainstream.. Crackling perimeter is fine... This guy really doesn't get it.....

1
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:05

Permalink

I did say sideboard. It would troll them across Ravnica and through the maze! But I would unleash it only when there are one of every gate on the field.
Sideboard dude, sideboard

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:08

Permalink

Not my deck, sorry.

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:18

Permalink

well, i have a feeling this is going to last even longer, but if little sorin wants to keep failing i wont stop him. its too damn funny

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:20

Permalink

Little Sorin has an army of vampires back in Innistrad.
Come at me, and you will have to try to get past them

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:23

Permalink

as soon as you can beat crackling perimiter

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:24

Permalink

Vampires, ATTACK!!!!!

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:25

Permalink

Too bad Innistrad cycles out....

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:38

Permalink

I'll be back. Besides, I may just be happier in modern. I'll maybe even team up with the phyrexians

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 00:48

Permalink

you moron sorin

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:19

Permalink

Still, no one has answered the overall question! What will you do with no more barriers?

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:22

Permalink

thats when the tokens kick in, having been amasing tokens while using crackling barrier they then become a force so large you cant block them all

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:24

Permalink

Thank you! Finally someone who can answer a question

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:29

Permalink

It's his deck, he knows how to play it not me...

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:37

Permalink

One again, your skipping over the point! You focused on the exact detail of Detention Sphere, not the true puropse of the original question 20 comments ago, which was answered 3 comments ago

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:43

Permalink

Like I said, not my deck :)

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:49

Permalink

Next time read the whole question in context, not just one card!

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:51

Permalink

Again, not my deck. And Detention sphere doesn't work that way....

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 02:55

Permalink

i got the whole "not my deck" the first time. Just read the whole question next time

0
Posted 27 June 2013 at 04:36

Permalink

Just read Detention Sphere. The ruling on the card is very clear... Kinda funny and ironic telling me to read the whole question when you can't read the whole card :)

And not my deck is my answer, I was giving it to you every time. It's not my deck, I don't know what the other win cons are...

:)

1
Posted 27 June 2013 at 04:42

Permalink

a glorious end to a funny arguement, hahaha.

1
Posted 27 June 2013 at 12:05

Permalink

That's IT!! I can't stand this anymore!! I play Azorius, and I am a huge fan of it. Get it right, little Sorin, you are completely wrong *once again*. Detention Sphere only exiles all with the same name ON THE FIELD, and does NOT exile future cards upon entry. Read the bloody card, you stupid noob!!
And for the record, you play Dimir AND Infect, so what the fuck do you know??

1
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:10

Permalink

PrinceCooshie101, you are my hero :)

But he did read the card HAHAHAHAHA

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:12

Permalink

LOLZ!! Thanks for the hero-i-ness =D
And thanks to SocceroosNinja in the first place for showing these noobs up. (also, make another deck for me to advertise my decks on!!)

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:19

Permalink

ummm, no. i will not put up a deck so you can advertise your decks, spam someone else, like little sorin

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:37

Permalink

Fuck off
Infect and Dimir win
This has a lot less of a chance than either of them in my opinion, but what does someone who plays Infect and Dimir know? A LOT!!!!!!!!! Besides, my lifelink, deathtouch, Rakdos and duel decks mean nothing to you?

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:44

Permalink

Little sorin is also bigger than you both!

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:44

Permalink

when you are taller than barboygimos let me know

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:48

Permalink

I'm taller than his fallen corpse

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:49

Permalink

I'm taller than his Shlong :P

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 05:26

Permalink

So you think you know something?
And there is proof you know nothing.
And you know what they say about tall people
I
I
I
I---
I
Not so tall now,eh?
Hahahahahaha

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 07:23

Permalink

My ego isn't one in need of constant maintinence by making others feel insignificant
My ego can also with stand any childish and moronic teasing like what you two are going on about you yammering sphincters

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 08:19

Permalink

I would cut bushstrider, phantom general and presinct captain, and try to trim a bit more maybe eyes in the skies, growing ranks, the sub-theme for tokens doesn't seem as powerful as the focus of the deck. If you just made the deck to have fun and you don't really care to make it better, then good for you I can't seem to leave well enough alone myself.

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 03:12

Permalink

Seriously? Do you even English?
Read the deck description, and maybe you will see why he has the cards in there in the first place! AND he's trying to prove a point; you don't need a Maze's End!
Damnit, what is WRONG with you noobs?

0
Posted 28 June 2013 at 04:16

Permalink

Why don't you put in a Greenside watcher or two? If Crackling Perimeters is the win strategy, then wouldn't being able to untap Gates be perfect? Also Saruli Gatekeepers might cost 4 cmc total, but that 7 life gain is pretty awesome, especially with a cloudshift or ghostly flicker (which works well with the gatecreeper vines too)

0
Posted 26 June 2013 at 03:44

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/s0rinmark0v-read-description/
Take a look!

0
Posted 10 October 2013 at 01:20

Permalink