AEthercraft

28 Decks, 254 Comments, 2 Reputation

well i don't really understand why you play paradox haze
all it does is accelerate the drawing process of your walking archive
making th eopponent draw many cards and that's goo dfor him not for you

you want to mill by making th eopponent draw but that's too dangerous cause he will draw the cards he needs soon and will be able to destroy your archive easily.

so this deck helps your opponent instead of you

i'm sorry i can't give much improvements or constructive comment but i think this deck just hasn't got real potential unless you maybe play it with more fog and mythos and howling mine

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 06:22 as a comment on Walking Archives

Permalink

and my apologies if you still think it's me (alex ) who posted the rude comments with 'thealextheory' account
i can asure you it's not me

seems well working hearing you tell all that.
but i have a friend playing a similar deck but with fungus and saprolings

and i must say that my U/R unblockable/burn deck finished him off before having a 300/300 and that when he had such big monsters i exiled his monster.

i think this deck is pretty vulnerable to creature removal.
so maybe counters can help

eh m there is a green card that costs 1 and can counter an enchantment or instant that targets a creature you control i can't remember the name

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 06:16 as a comment on Haters tread carefully...

Permalink

well ok but it doesn't matter to have that big creatures nowadays creatures must have bigger influence on the gameplay
that's why i don't like the concept neither
but if you think magic is about getting 400/400 monsters all the time it's your choice

and thealextheory was an account of 4 people i used to be the owner at the start, but since some of the co-owners were actually posting rude comments and i got downrated alot cause of that
i made my own account
that's the reason too i have some of the same decks.

and if you are going to search problems with me just cause you think I posted those rude comments well do it
it's your problem not mine

i'm just here to comment your deck and tell you my opinion and my opinion is
that your deck just needs some more play value
i am a tournament player not a flavor player that wants to make 400/400 creatures because they are really impressive
i like to play with tactics

now bye and don't start to argue with me about the 'thealextheory' fact i changed the password and the ones who were rude won't come on anymore so

have fun making edcks and stop complaining about rude comments cause internet has allways been 'terrorised'
by rude and stupid people.

also my posts probably look quite the same cause i'm from belgium
and sven is too

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 06:11 as a comment on Take It Like Hard Cock

Permalink

i agree with swordeh

seems to be a good player

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 05:53 as a comment on elves beatdown

Permalink

i would remove scattershot that's all i think

and add heritage druid and nettle sentinel for the allmost infinite combo

good work though
ciao

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 02:41 as a comment on elves beatdown

Permalink

haha i see cool way of getting creatures in your grave

i think this is the first well worked out crypt/consume deck i see
but try giving explanation

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 02:39 as a comment on -=Crypt =-

Permalink

well i don't know if it's how this deck is supposed to be buttt

i wouldn't play singles try playing more examples of a card
i think 100000 players would adise you the same

0
Posted 06 November 2009 at 02:37 as a comment on GreenWhiteBlue Creature

Permalink

o yes i mean the reason why i think it isn't that good is too because your creatre choice isn't that great and certainely not against new aggro
even if it's not for tournament

i would recommend some bigger creatures arcbound maybe?

and certainly remove the myrs.
there are soooo many choices for artifact decks you just have to find your way

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 15:08 as a comment on Take It Like Hard Cock

Permalink

i agree the name is misplaced don't give such stupid names not even to attract attention

and i think too the deck is bad for multiple reasons

the myrs aren't needed since you play a lot of 0 costs

and i just think master of etherium is too vulnerable it's not a good wincon cause any card could sweep it from the board

if it's just a fun deck you could maybe add whispersilk or something that gives shroud?
and if it's tourney
deffinitely play ravager

ciao

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 15:06 as a comment on Take It Like Hard Cock

Permalink

it's allready a better insect deck than the other on ei saw

but aren't the creatures overcosty?

i often get screwed when i play with creatures above 4 cost

0
Posted 05 November 2009 at 14:57 as a comment on Haters tread carefully...

Permalink

241-250 of 250 items