powndak

43 Decks, 92 Comments, 11 Reputation

the verdant catacombs are for bloodghast recursions.
i can attack with him one turn, trade for a 3/2 they own. next turn play a verdant catacombs (if they have 10 or less life hit with haste) and then when he dies, i pay 1 life and throw the verdant catacombs out to play ANOTHER land and he comes back. It also thins out the deck so i can get more creatures out.

0
Posted 01 May 2013 at 21:45 in reply to #346646 on Killing the Undead v2

Permalink

lmao! idk man, that seems crazy! but hell if you're that lucky. make a birthing pod deck without birthing pod! XD

1
Posted 01 May 2013 at 02:44 in reply to #346412 on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

i drew 7 hands
2/7 had priests of titania and elvish archdruid. so resistant to a lightning bolt or shock, then the other 5 hands, you couldn't do anything until turn 4 or 5 ;3

0
Posted 30 April 2013 at 17:14 as a comment on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

I would definetely add Verdant Catacombs and/or Misty Rainforest just to proc the Rampaging Baloths an extra time each land, since you have 4 rampaging baloths theres a high probability you're gonna pull one so the fetch lands would make him even scarier. Or you can do something like Fastbond (you may play any number of lands from your hand) and go to 24 or 25 lands. That could work too, with a Lotus Cobra. It's personal preference though, i think that would be cool tho XD

1
Posted 29 April 2013 at 04:21 as a comment on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

i changed the thrill-kill to Dark-confidant, i thought it would be more useful as this deck isn't necessarily high cost. with this card advantage i can get all my creatures out and just wipe my opponents board.

0
Posted 28 April 2013 at 18:07 in reply to #342821 on Touch Me, I Dare You

Permalink

simple, its an aggro deck, the more lower cost the better. Turn 2 i can drop a pacifism rendering a tarmogoyf useless and still come back to the frontline medic combo on turn 3. pacifism still renders a creature useless because it cant attack OR block. i guess its preference.. but thats my take on it

1
Posted 28 April 2013 at 14:31 in reply to #345570 on Mayor of Conscripts

Permalink

in that case, then go ahead and keep them

0
Posted 27 April 2013 at 01:40 in reply to #344939 on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

mtgvault record of comments in 2 hours? o.o

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 06:39 as a comment on Gruul Devour

Permalink

idk man, 8 elves out of 60.. you're bound to get like 2 or 3 of them during the whole game, for a 3 cost and 2 cost , i would say its not worth it compared to a llanowar elves that just gives you 1 mana. Llanowar elves, birds of paradise, arbor elf, elves of deep shadow are used in any kind of deck for mana ramp, but elvish archdruid and priest of titania are elf specific. sure in elf decks elvish archdruid and priest of titania are great because you can get 8 mana as early as turn 3, but in a deck like this, where the probability of getting those 8 elves isnt high, your turn 1/2/3 wont be good. an aggro deck with stormkirk noble (for example, shahar shenhar's deck) could potentially rape you.

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 06:37 in reply to #344939 on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

Luminarch Ascension or Aether Adept?

Hellppppppp :3

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 05:42 as a comment on I'd Tap That, Creature

Permalink

Better flying creatures than Kira? Please let me know

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 05:42 as a comment on I'd Tap That, Creature

Permalink

Disneyland is always a good idea

1
Posted 26 April 2013 at 05:17 in reply to #344940 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

you're probably better off without Priest of Titania. the fact that you only have 8 elves in the deck makes her almost worthless, id probably say the same thing for Elvish archdruid but its preference. he's good in elf decks because he helps counter pyroclasm and slag storm (elf deck's weakness). arbor elves/ llanowar elves might be a better pick.

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 05:11 as a comment on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

everflowing chalice? might work well with this deck, any deck with Vorinclex gets my like

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 05:04 as a comment on Just your Typical Green Deck

Permalink

what do you think about avenger of zendikar?

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:59 in reply to #344932 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

exactly. jund gives sick card advantage too. 2 skullmulcher's, more hand removal such as duress/ inquisition of kozilek against aggro/ or even slaughter games. liliana of the veil could work, but again idk if it fits into devour decks, throwing away a sprout for a detention sphere could work ;3

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:54 in reply to #344916 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

i mean hand removal would help.. imagine devouring 5 creatures, then getting unsummoned next turn

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:41 in reply to #344916 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

not really, i've never thought about devour decks. i was thinking Jund though (sprouting thrinax)

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:39 in reply to #344916 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

alright misunderstanding, sorry about that

0
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:32 in reply to #344913 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

okay we're done here, if you wanna mention anything else to make this deck better, then go for it.
i'd rather not argue on something so stupid, its a magic forum after all.
I thought you were just being ignorant and throwing cards out like you're a magic genius
but i guess not so my b

-1
Posted 26 April 2013 at 04:30 in reply to #344909 on Gruul Devour

Permalink

41-60 of 85 items