Raphael4

19 Decks, 167 Comments, 15 Reputation

i think u should add path to exile, birds of paradise, cerodon yearling and lightning helix

0
Posted 17 February 2012 at 12:26 as a comment on naya

Permalink

sounds very interesting and cool, i would personally suggest putting in 4 lost in the woods then adding maybe, birds of paradise and lanowar elves for some mana ramp to lost in the woods as you have no blockers here. i would also suggest 4 dungrove elders and take out the primordial hydra, its not needed. that would mean that you would have 2 planeswalkers, garruk relentless( avery good idea for this deck) 4 lost in the woods and 4 dungrove elders giving you a total of 10 nonland cards while you will still have 50 forests:)

0
Posted 08 February 2012 at 03:46 as a comment on Campsite

Permalink

looks like a cool and really effective deck.

0
Posted 06 February 2012 at 02:07 as a comment on Ultimate Super Amazing Mill Deck!!! V2

Permalink

no goblin grenade or lightning bolt??

0
Posted 05 February 2012 at 05:25 as a comment on celebrate burns ^^

Permalink

i your deck based around helix pinnacle solely? or is it just their for a reason unknown, because to be honest, it doesnt really look like it will be fast or easy enough to win with helix pinnacle

0
Posted 02 February 2012 at 22:09 as a comment on Deck Challenge: Helix Pinnacle

Permalink

looks like a cool deck, how does it play though? do u have all the cards?

0
Posted 31 January 2012 at 18:47 as a comment on Sorin control

Permalink

why the manalith? you can use leaden my, solemn simalcrum, mycosinth wellspring.

0
Posted 31 January 2012 at 03:21 as a comment on Sorin control

Permalink

how come? you only have 6 dragons and they are all weak dragons, atleast switch out volcanic dragon for rorix bladewing, other than that, i cant help you if you're nt gonna see how you can fix this deck. atleast take out 1 incinerate for the deck to be 60.

0
Posted 29 January 2012 at 17:10 in reply to #230441 on FIRE FROM ABOVE

Permalink

i would say either myr propagator as he is expensive for a 1/1 pplus its 3 mana too put only 1 1/1 down, or myr turbine, it requires you to tap 5 myr's, its expensive and most likely, u will already have the myr's available because of the consistency, i would definietly say add 4 overseers.

0
Posted 29 January 2012 at 08:38 as a comment on Myr

Permalink

i love this deck, its pretty cool, but where is your steel overseer?

0
Posted 29 January 2012 at 06:34 as a comment on Myr

Permalink

oh, by the way, no offense but how old are you? just curious because this deck is hmmm.... pretty terrible but, i will try to help you fix it.

1
Posted 29 January 2012 at 06:30 in reply to #230854 on Burn, Baby, Burn.

Permalink

i'm going to assume that you are fairly new to magic, i don't know if you are, so please dont take this offensively, im trying to help you. First, i hope that you are aware that this site gives you acces to every single card in the history of magic, with that in mind, you are able to make any deck the way you want it with the correct cards so that your deck will the right cards for the specific deck that you want to make, now. if you want this to be a succesful, fast and strong burn deck u must undertsand that u need to be able to play cards on your first turn, for most burn decks, the cards should be 3 mana cost or less so that you are able to play them on your first truns and multiple burn spells on your third turn, for example if you have 3 lands down on turn 3, you can a shock, lightning bolt and lava spike, these are all 1 mana cost burn spells. this deck has far to many creatures for a burn deck. the creatures are fairly high mana cost and wont be able to do anything for a while. this deck is way too slow. also, cards like balduvian barbarians are too high mana cost for a burn deck and dont do anything, they have haste and are very easy targets for removal spells, you know what dude, i could go on for an hour telling you everything that's wrong with this deck, but if u need specific help, just ask, ok? but i'm just trying to help, not trying to be mean.

0
Posted 29 January 2012 at 06:28 as a comment on Burn, Baby, Burn.

Permalink

looks like a cool deck, i like it.

0
Posted 28 January 2012 at 19:46 as a comment on Ajani Vengeant

Permalink

multicolor lands is what u need, stuff like rupture spire

0
Posted 28 January 2012 at 06:59 as a comment on MTG Titans

Permalink

this looks like a rly good naya deck, props:)

0
Posted 28 January 2012 at 06:56 as a comment on naya

Permalink

Mishra, artificer prodigy, worst EDH general ever! :D

1
Posted 27 January 2012 at 01:04 as a comment on Scarecrows

Permalink

dude, scarecrows are freaking beast! they are without a doubt the coolest creature type, u have just inspired me to make a scarecrow edh deck. :)

0
Posted 27 January 2012 at 00:13 as a comment on Scarecrows

Permalink

more dragonS! right now, u only have 6 dragons, and they are some of the weakest. take out the burn spells, i would have say, only 4 lightning bolts and maybe 2 shocks. put in bogardan hellkite or bailfire dragon. have 4 seething songs and take out ghitu and dwarven ruins, addd 4 smoldering spires, much more useful and more likely to draw. take out circle of flame its 2 mana and a waste of 2 spots in your deck it barely does any damage, most of the time it wont be lethal. u need to have exactly 60 cards, 24 lands i'd say. take out crimson mage for lightning greaves, u should keep the walls though. but, volcanic dragon sucks, look up rorix bladewing, its a lot better. u also need 4 dragonspeaker shamans, other than that, it looks good.

0
Posted 27 January 2012 at 00:07 as a comment on FIRE FROM ABOVE

Permalink

looks like a good deck, u can check out my jund token overrun deck here:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=283969

0
Posted 26 January 2012 at 23:57 as a comment on Stop! It's dragon time!

Permalink

looks like a good deck, it looks fun to.

0
Posted 25 January 2012 at 01:30 as a comment on Owls n dead(?)guy

Permalink

121-140 of 154 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last