A Woodland Army

by 521909 on 28 June 2012

Main Deck (63 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

this deck is strong.please add comments.

thank you!

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

17
Likes

This deck has been viewed 16,933 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000143

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for A Woodland Army

huhuhuhehoehuhuhoooohoohahaaaaa,,,...-nicely made
like the idea lol
***interrrestiNG!!!

0
Posted 29 June 2012 at 08:34

Permalink

LOOOOOOL

please chekk

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=355345

THx

0
Posted 29 June 2012 at 08:35

Permalink

Posted 29 June 2012 at 14:16

Permalink

interesting, at first glance, it looks like random cards, but I think this deck would work really well

0
Posted 29 June 2012 at 20:36

Permalink

thank you redwoodtreefolk

-2
Posted 29 June 2012 at 20:47

Permalink

Nicely done, this deck is well balanced. Also that sounds like a pretty fun idea to different lands like that. LOL

-1
Posted 30 June 2012 at 02:12

Permalink

Looks like a fun deck to play!

0
Posted 30 June 2012 at 02:34

Permalink

Rustedbucket has deleted this comment.

Posted 01 July 2012 at 18:38

Permalink

IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 02:49

Permalink

Fun fun fun

-1
Posted 30 June 2012 at 03:34

Permalink

uhhhhh interesting idea but doesnt seem like it can stand a chance against most decks. if ur going for only single copies, i would deff consider some mana producers just to have a lil more speed and a blocker if need be. not so sure 30 land is needed either.

2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 15:31

Permalink

I agree with demonking28

0
Posted 30 June 2012 at 15:41

Permalink

ok i will edit it a litle bit.

-2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 15:57

Permalink

also y not an overrun, garruke or even overwhelming stampede????? they can make great finishers. i would even consider the "fog" effect cards to keep u alive. this can be a power house yes, but against a player like me who is aggresive right out of the gate, this wont have a chance past turn 5 at the latest. gotta ask, what is the point behind this deck??? and it seems like all of ur decks r posted similar to this. im going to guess its the singleton format?

2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 16:13

Permalink

i am adding terrifying presence which is like fog but beter.

-2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 17:18

Permalink

i disagree there. for is far better than terrifying presence. its cheaper to cast and doesnt just stop all but one creature, it stops them all.

2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 17:21

Permalink

ok i put fog

-2
Posted 30 June 2012 at 18:19

Permalink

do you know what a mana curve is?

2
Posted 01 July 2012 at 05:14

Permalink

yes y do u ask.

-2
Posted 01 July 2012 at 11:53

Permalink

Not to be rude, but why are you advertising this as your best? It's just a stack of singletons...
I don't want to be mean, so don't take it personally; but you need to go and take a good look at this deck, get 3x and 4x on the cards you ACTUALLY NEED, you also need to look at the mana curve, cause right now there's very little chance you are going to have the right cards when you need them.

1
Posted 01 July 2012 at 14:51

Permalink

Hey need some advice for my Death Deck please help

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=352250

0
Posted 01 July 2012 at 16:27

Permalink

Singles!!!!

0
Posted 01 July 2012 at 16:56

Permalink

Rustedbucket has deleted this comment.

Posted 01 July 2012 at 18:34

Permalink

/Troll

BTW, thundering tanadon is solid proof of this decks "indestructibility"

0
Posted 01 July 2012 at 19:06

Permalink

THANK U EVREY ONE WHO HELPT ME GET ON THE MAIN PAGE!!

THANK YOU!!!

-2
Posted 01 July 2012 at 22:00

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=356250

0
Posted 02 July 2012 at 02:54

Permalink

Fyi, its pretty annoying whenever i go to any deck i always see the same comment by you in all caps. With you giving NO feedback to them at all, all u say is an empty comment. You probably dont even look at their decks. Btw its "indestructible" not "indistructible".

Sorry for that, but spamming your deck like crazy without giving any genuine help in return isnt cool.

2
Posted 02 July 2012 at 14:30

Permalink

sorry i stopt doing that and i do look at there decks

-2
Posted 02 July 2012 at 20:38

Permalink

Yeah i sorry if i sounded rude, but u dont leave a comment on how they should fix and improve their decks. Its not a rule just common curtiousy, if your going to advertise your deck.

1
Posted 03 July 2012 at 02:50

Permalink

YAy im on home page thank u

-2
Posted 03 July 2012 at 02:05

Permalink

Looks nice, kinda stompy deck.

-1
Posted 05 July 2012 at 05:31

Permalink

Boo.

2
Posted 06 July 2012 at 00:29

Permalink

Nice deck !
Check out this deck !
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=357615

1
Posted 06 July 2012 at 03:15

Permalink

hhmmm...

Boo.

Oh, btw,
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=359540

1
Posted 12 July 2012 at 07:00

Permalink

The deck is inconsistent dribblepoop. Bad decks are bad.

-2
Posted 08 December 2014 at 22:15

Permalink

Going to be honest, this doesn't look that great to me. Just a bunch of seemingly singles thrown together. Way too high in mana curve without mana producers. Also, why on earth is phyrexian swarmlord in there when there are no other infect creatures to make him more useful? Don't mean to hate on the deck or anything, but these are some weaknesses that I see that need to be dealt with.

3
Posted 12 February 2015 at 21:56

Permalink

Your deck is bad and you should feel bad.

-2
Posted 13 February 2015 at 09:28

Permalink