Elf Rock

by amanrocks12345 on 04 August 2008

Main Deck (61 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (5)


Sorceries (8)

Instants (2)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Comments appriciated but pretty much finished

This elf deck has been winning my FNM a few weeks in a row


thanks

Amanrocks12345

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,499 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0022042

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Elf Rock

It's hard to argue with a deck that's winning. You have a very low average casting cost, but you have multiple lands that come into play tapped, slowing your progression. Also, you have 10 of 40 spells that are black and almost all of your mana seems focused on getting the one black mana you need for any given black spell.

I'd put in 6 Forests and 2 Swamps, drop the Vivid lands, the Fertile Ground, Nettle Sentinel and Loxodon Warhammer and one Garruk Wildspeaker.

0
Posted 04 August 2008 at 21:18

Permalink

two Garruks and Warhammers are simply amazing in elves but getting the deck down to 60 cards is definately a good first step.
I'd cut the...
2 x Gleeful Sabotage (Sideboard Material)
3 x Nettle Sentinel (this is more aggro less rock)
3 x Thornweald Archer (Your already running Better two drops)
2 x Premature Burial (What will this kill that terror and soul reap wont)
The I'd add another Vanquisher and consider making more cuts for a couple boreal druids

0
Posted 04 August 2008 at 22:57

Permalink

Personally, I would trim out the Thronweld Archers completely and increase Talara's Batallion, Wren's Run Vanquisher, and Imperious Perfect to four each. As for Gleeful Sabotage and Soul Reap, they are definitely sideboard material. As far as land is concerned, remove the Vivid lands and toss in what govtgeek advised.

0
Posted 05 August 2008 at 05:13

Permalink

i win at a 10 person FNM thats is why and not everyone is played strong metagame decks

I wil...
cut the archers (3)
cut the Gleeful Sagotage to board (2) I put in for a platinum angel persist deck
cut needle sentinel (3)
cut vivids for 5 forets 3 swamp

Replace premature burial (2) with 1 terror 1 soul reap

0
Posted 05 August 2008 at 23:46

Permalink

also here are the decks at my tournaments

Elfs (me)
platinum angel persist
blue control suspend
blue black control
discard
red white evenide
red blue eventide
evershrike/ wite black eventide
white lifegain
red green aggro
elementals

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 00:15

Permalink

I like ure twist to this fast paced design. If u could get some Mutavaults, this would be an amazing deck... but then again, u might change things too much and it'll lose ure heavy hitter flavor. Comment on my Beast deck, I don't think I can make it any better, but I rarely lose with it. I wonder if it'll hold against ure Elf.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 03:05

Permalink

i only got 1 mutavault and i would like to maybe test against your deck

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 03:11

Permalink

Should be a fun match. U would eliminate my green creatures and most likely swarm me... or I would wipe out ure army and play an annoying spiritmonger. I would love to see the outcome.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 03:39

Permalink

Ahhh... I forgot about the standard difference. However, I still think I would stand a chance at winning even if u added a great card like Eladamri, lord of leaves.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 03:44

Permalink

if u look at the list of my decks at the tournement i go to i want to know some good side board cards i dont have in there to kill the other decks ( most of em have a large amount of the sideboard cards for a mach up against my deck)

i have trouble with the evershrike b/w deck but i usually win and have trouble with the suspend deck and the persist platinum angel deck if i dont win early enough

otherwise my matchups are good

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 16:13

Permalink

I would lose the Deathmark. Maybe state in ure info that the sideboard has another terror and soul reap. Those have more colors to play against. I would also change the archer to another extirpate and a couple thoughtseize. That would deal with ure blue. The extirpate are especially great against blue.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 18:51

Permalink

The Elvish Harbinger aren't that great. If they've done well in play, then keep them, but they tell ure opponent ure gonna play colossus or battalion. I would change them for another perfect and another vanquisher. Pretty good draw percentage that way for everything in ure deck. But if they've been cluch, and ure revealed card hasn't been countered or discarded constantly, than def keep them.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 19:07

Permalink

well i love your deck idea but i noticed, not one of your opponents is playing , red deck wins, quick and toasty, or faeires. these are some of the best decks in the current metagame.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 19:48

Permalink

sry noticed theres a blue blakc control is this a fae deck? ohh forgot about merfolk thats also a powerhouse metagame deck

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 19:49

Permalink

plz check out my kithkin deck i need advice.

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 19:49

Permalink

no one is playing fae which is awesome no one in the store has 1 magus of the moon so thats awesome and i also have a merfolk deck and i would crush a quick and toast deck but none are played i have almost all the cards for QnT except i dont want to build it i hate the deck idea

0
Posted 06 August 2008 at 22:18

Permalink

only thing i can say, is take out diety, and rock the firespouts!

0
Posted 07 August 2008 at 21:58

Permalink

i was going to put in 3 spout in board for 1 sabotage, 1 susher , and 1 archer

0
Posted 07 August 2008 at 22:12

Permalink

add
- elvish harbinger
- jagged scar archer
- lys alana hunt master
- and llanowar elite

0
Posted 08 August 2008 at 13:15

Permalink

it isstandard so no elite i have play tested with scar archers and hunmasters and they dont do much i only have like 3-4 elfs out at a time

0
Posted 08 August 2008 at 14:11

Permalink

Nice deck, I want it.

0
Posted 10 August 2008 at 20:45

Permalink

You have a very strong build here, definitely. If you are looking to change it up at all, though, I think you might make it even stronger by diversifying your creatures just slightly. If you're open to having a few more non-elves in the mix, I'd swap out a colossus and a fertile ground for a couple of dusk urchins. 3 fertile ground feels a little excessive in a 2 color deck, and even if the colossus is a bigger ass kicker, you'll still have 3 to stomp around with, with the urchin out front.

0
Posted 15 August 2008 at 07:21

Permalink

i am only playing 3 collosus i would be willing to play non elves put i play tested with dusk urchins and he just felt out of place

0
Posted 15 August 2008 at 13:13

Permalink

this deck is pretty gud.but its not a full elf deck like i expected.still pretty gud deck!

comment on the rest of my decks. plz

0
Posted 17 August 2008 at 14:46

Permalink

take out 1 sould reap otherwise nice ( i dont like the deity but if its winning alot nvm XD)

0
Posted 17 August 2008 at 23:21

Permalink

ok thnx for the comments

0
Posted 18 August 2008 at 02:47

Permalink

fertile ground is unnecessary. Instead add a forest, one more colossus, and wren's run vanquisher.

0
Posted 19 August 2008 at 00:59

Permalink

fertile is in sop i can turn 2 drop a batalion

0
Posted 19 August 2008 at 03:29

Permalink

Unmake is Great for Everstrike!!

0
Posted 22 August 2008 at 01:49

Permalink

again this deck can be beaten with 1 card i would enjoy playing these decks and destorying them just to shut u up about my decks

0
Posted 22 August 2008 at 02:35

Permalink

well i dont pay much attention to what cards are standard and what not but its a red enchantment that turns all non-basic lands into mountains and i didnt say ur decks were bad i would like to see how my decks would do against urs cause not all my decks are slow the fastest deck i own is the goblin/elves and even that can have its moments

0
Posted 22 August 2008 at 15:05

Permalink

not what i expected from elf deck but i like the way it works. also any way you could make it 60 cards? really like the deity and the soul reap, they are a lot of fun

0
Posted 26 August 2008 at 11:56

Permalink

Magus of the moon and you lose.

0
Posted 27 August 2008 at 03:40

Permalink

its a nice deck the truth is and i like it..but i think that you should put some basic lands instead of
Llanowar Wastes and could you tell me why you put nameless invasion?????
plz answer in my deck

0
Posted 27 August 2008 at 10:53

Permalink

well personally i think its really nice ! its got a good flow to it . i like it ! it could probably use a little more basic lands, but thats pretty much it . awesome !!
plz comment on my decks .

GOD BLESS !!!

0
Posted 03 September 2008 at 02:58

Permalink