The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
For casual play - modern is for limiting the crazyness. Alternative win-con could be inkmolth+runechanters.
This deck has been viewed 1,629 times.
I take it this is a "frustrate your opponent until he folds" kind of deck? Because, otherwise, I don't see ANY win condition. XD I suppose that what the Shackles are for, to grab the few creatures they may manage to get out and ping away at them? And the alt win condition you mention would be in the sideboard-not-appearing-in-this-film, right? Other than my confusion, I actually think the deck is pretty neat. :D Low cost AND likely to make your opponent scream!
Permalink
Well, the inkmolth+runechanters alternative win-con is more of an "I cannot decide which one I prefer more". As its more of a casual think I'm not sure if working with a sideboard is worth the effort. Ink+Rune would be better against creature-light decks, and... yeah, people that figure out not to play creatures until they get a Shatter. Hmm, better add a man-land or something to actual be able to win without the opponent :) The land-bounce is mostly to get a running-start on the op. It's hard/unlikely to last for many rounds, but Shackles+Synod does make good use just a bit of tempo-control. But, yeah. The griefer-aspect is sorta putting me a bit off on this deck. I hoped it could be U-control without the grief of "I counter - everything!", but this too has a big portion of a "grief or suck" quality. But as you say, land-bounce seems to have a good money-for-grief ration :) (disregarding the few expensive cards here...)
I agree, I likely wouldn't play this deck more than a couple of times, if only because I know how it feels to be on the other side of tight control decks and the frustration can make me quit a tournament. LOL A couple of man lands wouldn't hurt, at least in the 'board against, as you said, creature light decks.