Punishing Control

by ANON on 04 October 2009

Main Deck (64 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A deck made to piss off your opponent.

In the sideboard is a very cruel combo which goes very well with Endless Whispers.
The basic combo in this deck is: Godhead + Reverence = No harm to you
The control combo: Canonist + dash of Hopes on Scepter = Easy kill
The rest is just to increase the punishment on the opponent.

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,005 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

51152700

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Punishing Control

Black/White.... Wheres Vindicate?

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:19

Permalink

Too old school but still a great card.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:23

Permalink

To old school?! Mortify, Nausea, and Ishochron Sceptor aren't that much older than Vindicate. Infact, Nausea is older than Vindicate....

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:25

Permalink

That just warms my heart to see the heart smashing Vindicate in another deck.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:26

Permalink

Next thing, keep all decks down to 60 cards. The only deck that should ever run more than 60 to date is Stasis, since it can actually play a stall match to go down to a deck out.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:30

Permalink

I can't remove anythiny else from this deck cos then it will be way off balance.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:31

Permalink

Way off balance? in What Way? A good deck consists of a few things: A Amazing Mana Curve and Fixing, Consistancy, and Reliability.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:36

Permalink

I can't have a few creatures for example cos the probability of getting them when I want will be slim.
The same goes for the spells.

I try to keep at least 3 cards of each so that I get them when I need them.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:44

Permalink

I can't have a few creatures for example cos the probability of getting them when I want will be slim.
The same goes for the spells.

I try to keep at least 3 cards of each so that I get them when I need them.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:44

Permalink

Your playing 3 of all these creatures, that you do not have to have. Take a look at my decks, look at each creature, and then think why I only run 3 of a creature if ever. My example, Dark Confidant. Bob has one me so many tournaments it is not even funny, people always ask, why only 3 sometimes? Because, it is a card you usually do not want more than 3 of. When choosing a number count for a card, you have to consider how many of this card you could draw and be happy with and how often. If you notice my decks, I play very few 1,2, or even 3 of a card because of the fact I KNOW what I need to draw in order to keep myself in the game. This deck also has a funky curve, you have barely any cards that are low in cost, but many at higher costs (Yes, 4 and above is pretty high costing) and you only have 18 Lands. Every card should be a specially picked and very well thought out card, not just, oh! This will be amazing in this deck because it fits a theme! Also, selecting cards is important because there may be better cards out there: Reverence, why would you play this over Ghostly Prison or Propaganda? You shouldn't.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 03:53

Permalink

Sorry about the double posting browser error.

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 04:05

Permalink

not a big deal

0
Posted 04 October 2009 at 04:10

Permalink