Can't Touch This (M14)(Stndrt)

by baguvix on 14 July 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Instants (3)


Enchantments (4)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

i have a deck with new m14 cards... my purpose is pump this hexproof cards with enchantments and score. i wait your thoughts.

Deck Tags

  • Standard
  • Type 2
  • Blue
  • White
  • Green
  • Enchantment
  • Hexproof

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

10
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,441 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

24120020

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Can't Touch This (M14)(Stndrt)

I don't typically play this color combo, but I may just try this! I'm digging it!

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 14:32

Permalink

make a proxy and try, i will wait your suggestions :)

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 14:37

Permalink

Unflinching courage is arguably the best standard enchantment in these colors, you should test it out for sure

2
Posted 14 July 2013 at 15:25

Permalink

thanks for the suggestion. i try this replacing with blessing

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 20:45

Permalink

Another good enchantment to consider is Spectral Flight.

1
Posted 14 July 2013 at 15:42

Permalink

i know this card too, and zephyr charge is most useful in late game i think. but thank you for suggestion =)

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 20:46

Permalink

I laugh at the fact that you put in 20 copies of 4 in this deck :P

Good deck! Maybe you'd want more defense in this deck because aggro decks can just kill you in turn 4 so maybe a boardwipe?

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 15:44

Permalink

Unflinching Courage counters aggro pretty well and allows you to race.

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 15:46

Permalink

imposign sovereign is useful for haste decks. but thank you for suggestion

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 20:47

Permalink

Oh my bad, I meant 15 copies of 4.

Righteous Authority?

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 21:23

Permalink

I would definitely include Unflinching Courage as the others said. I am not very fond of the Abundant Growth as it does not grant any acceleration, I would use Farseeks (one more land early on, and can look for shocklands). Also I would run 3 Geist, 4 is to much for a legendary creature (as two in hand is a dead draw).
If you have time check my bant modern aura deck, same colors different format: http://www.mtgvault.com/kajuata/decks/bant-modern-auras/

1
Posted 14 July 2013 at 17:31

Permalink

you run 4 geist. he is NEVER a dead draw. having one in your hand allows you to attack into ground blockers and get 4 damage across without worrying about him dying. he is also fairly easy to kill, despite being hexproof. If you run Geist, you run 4.

-2
Posted 14 July 2013 at 17:41

Permalink

but farseek is not enchantment and can't pump ethereal armor... thanks for your suggestion =)

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 20:57

Permalink

No Silence? Its an awesome tempo card, causes them to not cast spells for a turn for W. Would be good in sideboard for mirror or aggro decks.

-1
Posted 14 July 2013 at 19:07

Permalink

i didn't choice instants expect ray of revelation... for aggro decks i have imposign foreign.. still thank you for suggestion =)

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 20:59

Permalink

1.You desperatelly need removal. Pacifism, Oblivion Ring, or Detention Sphere to work with Ethereal Armor.
2.I cant believe you missed Unflinching Courage, one of the best auras out there
3.Instead of Fiendslayer I like Sigarda, Auramancer or even Ajani's Chosen more (each with different purpose).
4.Spectral Flight is superior to Blessing
5.You can afford some basic lands with Abundant Growth.
6.Its too expensive, all the shocklands, full playset of Geists (2 or 3 tops should do, its legendary), this will suck you dry :-)

0
Posted 14 July 2013 at 21:19

Permalink

Any sort of boros/RG aggro owns this type of deck

-2
Posted 16 July 2013 at 23:48

Permalink

lol....no.

0
Posted 16 July 2013 at 23:54

Permalink

lol yes..
http://www.mtgvault.com/xxsupernova103xx/decks/boros-blitz/

-2
Posted 16 July 2013 at 23:56

Permalink

oh, so you are just stirring up things so people check out your deck? how do you figure your boros deck beats a Bant Hexproof deck?

Edit: that Boros deck doesnt look very strong. It looks like you threw leftover cards together.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ninjastyle612/decks/boros-aggro-t2/

this Boros deck took 5th in a 75 player PTQ. and would not beat my own Bant Hexproof deck.

-2
Posted 16 July 2013 at 23:59

Permalink

his isnt bant...

-2
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:02

Permalink

he has nothing to stop aggro. no banishing cards. no counters. nothing

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:02

Permalink

by turn 5, i can do 20 plus points of damage.
whats he going to have out by then? a few 1/1s and probably a 3/3...

-1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:04

Permalink

OMG. you should go work on your own deck before criticizing other peoples. THIS deck that we are commenting on IS 100% for sure BANT.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:04

Permalink

HIS deck needs work. it is, as it says, a prototype to keep the hexproof deck alive in standard after M14 drops. it needs counters, it needs removal. YOU said that ANY boros or R?G aggro owns THIS TYPE of deck, and youre wrong. flat out. Well built Bant Hexproof is the fastest deck in standard. I can deal lethal on turn 3.

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:07

Permalink

most successful bant decks have removal. at least, some sort of removal/control. this has none, zero, nada.. gets owned by aggro decks.

-1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:07

Permalink

no removal doesnt mean it gets owned, it means its a race. it completely nullifies your removal, and makes you beat it in a flat out sprint. you win some, he wins some.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:08

Permalink

my deck also is 200$ less than his. and can beat his. your point is invalid

-1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:09

Permalink

you havent invalidated any of my points. you said ANY boros or RG beats this TYPE of deck, and it doesnt. youre wrong. theres a reason your deck has a budget price: good players dont play with bad cards.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:11

Permalink

what/who dictates what is a bad card?

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:14

Permalink

Wow, I thought this deck lacked some strong enchantments (e.g. Unflinching Courage, Spectral Flight) to be good and Boros could truly beat it, but then I saw what you posted...
I wonder how you defend against:
T1: Gladecover Scout
T2: Rancor + Ethereal Armor
T3: (here is where Unflinching Courage should have been) But Curiosity and second Ethereal Armor will suffice
My point is, your deck is slower.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:14

Permalink

my deck isnt a "budget deck". i just dont need certain cards for the strategy im doing. it so happens when building and play testing this, i didnt need those expensive cards

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:17

Permalink

the cards themselves do that job nicely. you think theres not a reason a Thundermaw Hellkite cost $40 when it came out, but Utvara Hellkite never broke $3? Versitility. Utvara is GREAT in EDH, but almost useless in standard. Bad Card for standard.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:18

Permalink

@Zipec. Ratchet Bomb, turn 2, nuff said

-1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:23

Permalink

@ninja style, disagree, Thundermaw Hellkite is used in a certain type of deck, as Utvara hellkite is used in a different style of standard deck. both can easily be used in standard, thus making neither a bad card

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:25

Permalink

that ratchet bomb thats not in your decklist? build a better deck before you come to someone elses with criticism.

and cool, you play that ratchet bomb turn 2, which slows you down even further. then you put a counter on it, waiting another turn, while he smashes you for damage, and plays another creature on T2. then you pop Bomb on your turn 3,killing off your Loyalist and his Scout, but hes still got an unblockable stalker on the board. and play a what? Frontline Medic?



you lose to a stacked up stalker, because you wasted your turn 2 on a ratchet bomb.

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:25

Permalink

@xxsupernova103xx: How many copies do you run exactly? Last time I checked, there was none.
(To explain: I didnt say it can't be handeled, I just said you have no answer. You can slow him down only by siding Sundering Growth)

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:27

Permalink

Children, please, calm down...both decks are good. Aggro wins quick but can easily be blocked or raced by bant enchantments. However, some aggro can just overwhelm and win anyway. As for the cards doing work by themselves, thats just boring...making a card work well means that it isn't a bad card anymore. Bottom line, if it works for you it works. Instead of insulting, suggest improvements. Stop making the community worse by arguing about stupid stuff, the site was meant to help eachother out. The actual help is just too rare on here anymore.

2
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:28

Permalink

yes. youre right. they are used in different types of decks. one wins, one doesnt. I didnt say Utvara was a bad CARD, I said it was bad for standard. and it is.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:28

Permalink

@zipec: a much better answer to Bant Auras is Parasaline (sp) as it destroys all enchantments and provides lifegain.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:31

Permalink

@Gasp: he came in here wanting to start a guild feud. He got one.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:31

Permalink

"that ratchet bomb thats not in your decklist? build a better deck before you come to someone elses with criticism." its in my sideboard. what to you is considered, a better deck?

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:32

Permalink

consistent winners are better decks. how many people do you get at your FNM? do you play 3 rounds? 4? 5?

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:34

Permalink

And now this is going to be on the hot decks page, and any new member is gonna see this front page deck with a long ass argument on it. Gary and Ian said themselves in the forums that THIS, what you are doing right now, is one of the biggest problems on the site. Seriously, it isn't helping. If you think that trying to change his mind is helping the community or even this deck, I'm going to have to disagree.

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:36

Permalink

I stated a comment, "Any sort of boros/RG aggro owns this type of deck" you disagreed. I showed my counter statement with example, showing A boros deck(happened to be mine, could have been another or a RG aggro). then you insult my deck, and my deck making skills(by making assumptions). 'oh, so you are just stirring up things so people check out your deck? how do you figure your boros deck beats a Bant Hexproof deck?

Edit: that Boros deck doesnt look very strong. It looks like you threw leftover cards together.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ninjastyle612/decks/boros-aggro-t2/

this Boros deck took 5th in a 75 player PTQ. and would not beat my own Bant Hexproof deck.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:36

Permalink

So no, i DIDNT come in here wanting to start a guild feud..

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:37

Permalink

You sir were the first to insult me..

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:37

Permalink

@Gasp: this is the problem with a top decks page to begin with. you get the trolls and the other bullshit. the top decks is a joke.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:38

Permalink

@super: you didnt answer my question. you dont need to quote the convo, Ive been here the whole time, and I defended this deck, not so much to insult you, but to delve for your further explanation.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:38

Permalink

And if you ignore them, they stay away. Top decks isn't (aren't?) a joke, they're included so that the site seems more active to newer users. But yeah well, I guess I can't change your mind.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:43

Permalink

you cant. I was here when top decks was the reason this site was failing, so they discontinued it, and it became MUCH better. now its back, and stupid troll bullshit is back with it.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:45

Permalink

Yeah I was here too. I'm just saying, the reason that they're back is because of an influx of new users. They want to make the site active and appealing to bolster the community. They're trying to get rid of trolls also. Its taking a while, but they're working on it. Best thing we can do until then is ignore them.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:49

Permalink

I dont disagree with that, but sometimes discussion happens. if his original comment had been phrased less insulting, then it would have been responded to in a more friendly manner. tough love, man. tough love

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 00:53

Permalink

Alright, I can respect that. Poor baguvix...lol

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:01

Permalink

lol...poor guy..got a top deck of this lol

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:05

Permalink

And for some reason all of his comments got downvoted...

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:11

Permalink

OP? or this Boros guy?

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:15

Permalink

op.

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:16

Permalink

sad. so many haters around here

0
Posted 17 July 2013 at 01:20

Permalink

i build this deck for try new m14 cards and get any suggestions from mtgvault members, i never claim this deck is great... thank you for all good intends.. but i care about why my comments getting disliked because i never say any harmful words to other commentators... again thanks

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 18:58

Permalink

A lot of mine also got down voted. Even before the argument, where that is expected. I think it's just some kid who thinks they're being funny. I wouldn't worry too much about it

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 20:17

Permalink

To be honest, I think there's just a bunch of dicks just wanting to down the comments for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON! You sir, have not done anything wrong. :)

1
Posted 17 July 2013 at 21:19

Permalink