Vampire Love

by bigsav on 23 March 2007

Main Deck (66 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Massive vampire reanimate, Death Pits of Rath, Soul Collector and Viridian Longbow allows for a bit of scariness with Mephidross Vampire providing +1/+1 for ping and sudden spoiling for a bit of fun

Deck Tags

  • Creature-Based

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,684 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

026500

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Vampire Love

What can be said, Soul Collector + Veridian Longbow + Death Pits of Rath = Food for Vampires plus a little thing called gaining control of the creature you destroy. Have Mephidross out to get a +1/+1 bump up every time you do it

0
Posted 23 March 2007 at 08:22

Permalink

Why did you add so many lands? With Mephirdross, you could have put in more useful swamp creatures, like BLood tyrant, or Gravekepper, Zombie Outlander, Grixis Slavedriver, or extractor demon. And they would all be vampires, with Baron Sengir, you could regenerate them.

0
Posted 07 June 2009 at 17:26

Permalink

i think

0
Posted 07 June 2009 at 17:26

Permalink

plus, you could have added doubling cube, leaving you with a lot more room to add those creatures

0
Posted 09 June 2009 at 17:44

Permalink

I agree with Rainman... a few too many lands. I probably would reduce the total number of Spells while adding 2x Feast of Blood and 2x Blood Tribute and also add a fewer lower level Vamps like Vampire Nighthawk that you could get out with less mana but are still useful (Flying, Lifelink, Deathtouch).

0
Posted 01 January 2010 at 19:12

Permalink

I mean a FEW lower level Vamps, not "fewer".

0
Posted 01 January 2010 at 19:13

Permalink

i like it no zendikar very creative

0
Posted 26 January 2010 at 18:51

Permalink