mindslaver lock

by blaze on 17 February 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Control the game and commence the beat down. Sorry guys I've been gone a while but I have been building still this is a deck I've been workin on for about a week I plan to run it at fnm whatcha guys think all and any imput welcome.

Deck Tags

  • Control

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,281 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

035000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for mindslaver lock

To obtain lock all u need is 4 land 3 blue creatures one of them being GA. Prototype portal with mindslave control there turn every time till u get waht u need for the win

0
Posted 17 February 2011 at 12:01

Permalink

No enough Mana, I dont think that there is enough to keep you in the game long enough. Maybe add more mana, and take out a number of portals, because in reality, you really just need like... 2 at the most and take out one mindslaver. So now we have 23 lands, even if 4 of them come in tapped.

Just a suggestion :P

0
Posted 17 February 2011 at 12:06

Permalink

My mana base is been great all I need is 3 to commence beatdown. It does great bc everything is such a low cost all the high cost is due to arts that ur GA pays for I might add 2 more lands

0
Posted 17 February 2011 at 12:12

Permalink

Of course ur creature base allows u to scry the whole game and depths is used for it also. Set ur deck and go. The 12 practice games I've played won all decks I played were meta based but also not the best players certanly not pro. Pls give help if u can construtive critisim pls

0
Posted 17 February 2011 at 12:07

Permalink