Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
A quick and easy deck to to learn and play with a good variety of landfall tactics and for fun. This decks doesn't and will not include any rares at all to keep the cost down. Try it and test it out. See how well it does. Feel free to post any comments on this deck if you like it or you think it needs more improvement. STANDARD LEGAL *2nd post of this deck
This deck has been viewed 3,748 times.
this is pretty good. +1 please check out my NEED OPINIONS deck. its also landfall and i would very much appreciate you opinion as it is also budget kinda because it was built solely from cards in my collection presently
Permalink
i'd take out any panorama cards. they are terrible. good deck though.
This is good, dont listen to entity about the Panoramas. Your playing budget so they make good replacements for the Fetchlands until you can afford them, 2 Landfall abilities going off with 1 Land? Sounds pretty good to me. +1 For budget this is good, also, put Lightning Bolt in here if you can squeeze it in over some of your other stuff.
I run Burst Lightning over Lightning Bolt because it's Budget, but also because Burst Lightning works well when I have a lot of lands (In landfall, you get a lot of lands). I mean Burst Lightning's cheaper and works better than Lightning Bolt when I have a lot of mana. 4 Damage for 5 Mana VS 3 Damage for 1 Mana. 4 Damage wins when I don't really need to save up mana because I have way too much lands because this is a landfall deck. That is why I pick Burst Lightning over Lightning Bolt (plus, it's cheaper too)
nice deck.
Good For budget. However, -1 intimidation bolt -1 naya charm------- +2 more soul's fire - 2 adventuring gear -1 terramorphic exp-----------+3 rampant growth Replace burst lightning with regular lighning bolt, its more efficiant, and theres no reason to pay an additional 4 mana for 2 more damage, its a waste. Not Bad, but not the best budget. Oh and please check out the deck that you verbally slaughterd without any suggestions on how to make it better and just gave me negitivity. " Because the gods wish you to win"
I will take out Intimidation Bolt since you think its not that good However, I am keeping Naya Charm because it has pretty much one of 3 abilities 1. Deal 3 damage 2. Return ANY CARD FROM ANY GRAVEYARD back to hand 3. Tap ALL CREATURES Naya Charm is a lot more flexible and thus would warrant more play than Soul's Fire, which is harder to use and requires a creature. Plus if my opponent killed my creature in response to Soul's Fire, I would lose 2 cards. Not sure why do you want to remove 2 Adventuring Gear, it does stack with all other landfall abilities and I have a lot of creatures... Perhaps give me more of a reason to take it out. I seem to get lands to fall well with 4 Harrow and 4 Khalni Heart Expedition (1 card for 2 land). So the quest lies in that is Rampant growth really worth it? It is 1 card for 1 land. Though I am keeping Burst Lightning over Lightning Bolt. This is budget and I want to have fun by not playing the most "powerful" spells. Yea, 90% of the time, Lightning Bolt > Burst Lightning. But hey, there is that 10% time Burst Lightning is better and I want to make use of it. Landfall sounds great because hey, I have like a billion lands right? It's also budget, so I'm trying to keep the cost down because Lightning Bolt is around a $1.00 card while Burst Lightning is only around $0.25.
why is bant panorama in there?
only problem i see with it is way too many land searchs to basic land ratio i would take out 2 of the panorama's for 2 regular lands.... P.S. i love pancakes =D
Bant is there because I found out I need more lands. 24 lands seems a bit too little for the landfall deck so I added one more Umm... with Panoramas I can landfall during my opponent's turn you know. Like if my opponent casts a Shock (Deal 2 damage to a creature) on my Steppe Lynx, I can in response use the Panorama's effect and landfall and give the Steppe Lynx +2/+2 until EOT on my opponent's turn, saving it.
Landfall is fun to play even on a budget, I enjoy playing mine quite a bit. I recommend replacing the panoramas with Evolving Wilds for the same amount of landfall with no mana cost. Emeria Angel and Vines of Vastwood have also worked very well in my deck. my GW budget landfall deck, with a strange twist: http://mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=153141
I'm blind, you already have Vines of Vastwood. ;)
Im aware this is budget, but I think Rampaging Baloths would dominate in this deck. I'm really unsure of their price though. Can't be more than a couple bucks.
I think you should have explore, it is really good and cheap. and also evolving wilds for the same effect as terramorphic expanse. im trying to make a budget landfall deck on my own, and i really need some advices, so if you get a chance please look at it and comment. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=170317