ally dangerous

by colop1 on 21 September 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

green and red ally deck

tell me what you think and tell me what would be your changes

Deck Tags

  • Casual

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,626 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0002418

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for ally dangerous

Vastwood animist and highkand berserker I would put it for sure. Tuk grunts I would take out because Kazuul does that and more for the same cost

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 00:14

Permalink

thank you very much 4 remembering me vastwood

but im not sure about highland cause i dont know what to take off to put him in

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 03:40

Permalink

^^^^^ This
i dont usually see red ally decks, so this is kinda strange for me, i kinda like it though

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 02:14

Permalink

Red Ally decks are rare but this looks like it could work.. I do have to add that Highland Bersekers may be a better option than Battlesingers since it gives you a bit more survivability when attacking.... Maybe add Tezzeret's gambit for some fun proliferation shenanigans :)

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 06:49

Permalink

i want keep cause its an ally thats boost other easily for less
and i thought long time about berserker and you gave me a good reason why put it thx

and 4 tezzeret gambit id be more putting in contagion engine ;P

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 13:15

Permalink

Honestly that wouldn't be the worst idea but its way too Mana heavy.. Maybe you could try Volt Charges...?

0
Posted 26 September 2011 at 21:18

Permalink