Crimson_Hellion

2 Decks, 11 Comments, 0 Reputation

The idea is nice enough, but it just doesn't seem solid enough to beat say a quick beatdown deck or even a white weenie. Need more knights to really make use of Haakon.

0
Posted 11 June 2008 at 06:51 as a comment on Haakons Mystical Mannequin Teachings

Permalink

ok, no offense, but it looks slapped together. Having alot of nice abilities in the deck is one thing, but having alot that work well together is another. My advice is find a more sure strategy and build heavier off of that

0
Posted 09 June 2008 at 21:04 as a comment on Penance of the Dead

Permalink

Only one real problem I can see. Using Juniper order's ability isn't targeting anything. It has to directly say, does certain effect to Target creature. That's what we call a passive ability. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I've seen so far

0
Posted 03 June 2008 at 23:41 as a comment on G_W_B Infinite Deck

Permalink

oh and now cause Wizards is all gay like that, black has Damnation

0
Posted 27 May 2008 at 23:35 as a comment on Elf power

Permalink

lol, promenade can be nice, but the original elf deck build using the timerwatches was much better. Wellwishers keep life high, have taunting elves to clear defensive enemies and maybe for a few lands, throw in the wirewood lodges. Elvish promenade can be nice, but playing 2 in a row by no means guarantees a victory. Red just pyroclasms and your army dies, green just builds right along side with tokens or something else, blue washes out or counters, white wrath's or does something like that

0
Posted 27 May 2008 at 23:34 as a comment on Elf power

Permalink

Last time I faced a squirrel deck, it was a squirrel opposition deck. That was a nightmare.

0
Posted 18 May 2008 at 07:41 as a comment on Fun with Squirrels

Permalink

You need something to cycle your cards. Either try something like browbeats or perhaps wheel of fate. Also, you may want to consider a few alternatives to just stacking burns. Instead of the conflagrate, a cheaper alternative is pryclasm, a very nice card as well as Martyr of Ashes since you're mono red burns. You also may want to consider replacing Blaze with Demonfire. The effect without hellbent is better and with is incredibly better.

0
Posted 18 May 2008 at 07:31 as a comment on help with this deck

Permalink

lol, I see what ya mean. It looks alot like a randomly thrown together deck without a real strategy, but I know the feeling. Just get everything down on the page and then sort out what ya like and don't later.

0
Posted 13 May 2008 at 08:59 as a comment on Black horror

Permalink

I like it, but there's some problems that would hurt this deck pretty hard core

0
Posted 13 May 2008 at 08:51 as a comment on Scorcher

Permalink

Ya, the side board is only really more cause I mentioned it's cost dependant so the extirpates wouldn't be there. I just happen to like red black so I chose it. And to Azndragon whatever your numbers are, grow up and learn how to constructively criticize. I'm just suggesting a deck so unless you can come up with some logic as to why this is the "worst deck" then all I can say is get a life.

0
Posted 12 May 2008 at 08:17 as a comment on Red Black Megrim kill

Permalink

Wow, that's just no.... Ok, well I understand your enthusiasm for swamp cards and undead and such, but you need an overall strategy, not just have a bunch of strong cards with one or two one mana costing stuff. ANd you should pick, either get the huge bonuses from having lots of stuff in your graveyard or for getting stuff back. I like the rimebound but having one pretty much assures you won't get a first turn zombie. Festerings are still better. Try again

0
Posted 10 May 2008 at 03:57 as a comment on

Permalink