The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
This deck has been tested against \'burn\' and \'creature\' decks. You probably haven\'t noticed but the deck is built to avoid hence the cards with fear and flying. The only problem I can see this deck having is against a black deck then your screwed except for flying. The discard is also their to give you a little advantage over your opponents and it has won games at turn 5. It hasn\'t lost a best of 3 yet.
This deck has been viewed 3,529 times.
Without even looking at the cards in this deck, I can tell you right now. You are screwed on mana. A deck needs at least 22 lands in it.
Permalink
Also, I don't really see the strategy behind this deck. I admit the mana cost average is probably 3 so it's not slow(if you get mana) but I mean is it a discard deck? You're not going to be a good deck with just some randomly assembled fairies and some goblins.
Happy now? Oh, and when your maximum mana is only 4 without a banneret then it's your fault for not mulliganing when you should have. The deck needs only 2 mana and thats it working at a good amount.
Funny. 2 people at fnm played this deck last week. Except they had earwig squads which would benefit you a lot, i mean after all 1pyroclasm and its all over for your creatures
actually xxxx burn hates this deck i'm his playtesting helpbut he is bragging a bit we haven't really tried against a real creature deck just some bad goblin crap i made
It still counts. :)
xxxx Where your right, Earwig Squad doesn't have any type of evasion which I have based this deck around. SO it could be interesting to add them in but I can win in 5 turns so it's all good till I find a big fault I won't add anything to it.
I'd like to see you win in 5 turns against what I have in store for this deck. It's called creature control, ever heard of it? It wrecks creature based decks like this. Fast lock decks and some combo decks can stop this too. Also, in standard, try going up against GW with 4 Wilt-Leaf Lieges in it with all your discard. It would make me laugh. Sorry, the deck isn't bad, but it's not as awesome as you think it is.
Its true Dagonium this deck is poor you should look at my rogue deck for a really good deck.
Hmm... This is the second time i've seen you Bcmaledragon... Not liking my decks are you? Oh well... As for smc1215 the name is more of the fact I wrote the deck up at 5-6am so I was bored and thought of putting something stupid as the name to see what I got and it worked. Also, creature control... Fair enough but you can't prove anything until the decks have played.
hey smc1215 are you talking about your white creature control deck if so your dead by turn5 even playing extended against this deck lets see ye beat me with yer "creature control" my burn eats you it's easy to beat a deck when you know what's comin' and beating a standard when you run extended isn't that hard
See he knows the score.