Discussion Forum

worst card ever

post what you think is the most pointless/un-usable card ever made by wizards of the cost.do not post unhinged and unglued.
Posted 13 November 2008 at 21:06

Permalink

Sorrow's Path
0
Posted 15 November 2008 at 18:51

Permalink

Moonlace U
Instant TS-R
Target spell or permanent becomes colorless until end of turn.
0
Posted 18 November 2008 at 14:31

Permalink

Wow ... Sorrow's Path is truly one pathetic card.
0
Posted 11 December 2008 at 04:34

Permalink

Sorrow's Path can't even produce colorless mana.....

The card the most useless to me of all cards I own: Scornful Egotist. 1/1 no abilities for 4 mana (morph costs + turn face up for U)? Or should I play it right away for 8 mana? :D
0
Posted 11 December 2008 at 14:10

Permalink

i remember there being a reason for scornful egotist, but icant seem to remember what it was
0
Posted 12 December 2008 at 20:54

Permalink

I say One with Nothing. It's pretty bad...>_>;
0
Posted 05 January 2009 at 01:45

Permalink

Scornful Egotist...That is amazing. I've never seen anything that...bad...
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 02:47

Permalink

when i started playing magic, which was about the same time as this forum was started(3-4 months), i bought a tenth edition double pack that actually came with only 1 tenth edition pack and another non-standard pack. I opened it, found scornful egotist, then went home and burned it on halloween in a neighbors pumpkin.
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 03:15

Permalink

test. can my picture be seen?
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 06:03

Permalink

no, no it can't.
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 06:04

Permalink

now it can!

Sorry for the 3 random posts.
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 06:08

Permalink

[QUOTE=thatoneguy]Sorrow's Path[/QUOTE]

It would be useful if say you have a 6/6, and a 5/5. They have a 2/2 and a 3/3. 3/3 block your 6/6 and gets giant growthed, making it a 6/6. you tap that, exchange the blockers, your 6/6 lives and your 5/5 dies.

[QUOTE=MagicMan514;229]Moonlace U
Instant TS-R
Target spell or permanent becomes colorless until end of turn.[/QUOTE]

Get around circle of protection, and protection in general.

[QUOTE=SolArc;440]I say One with Nothing. It's pretty bad...>_>;[/QUOTE]

Not if your running a madness/unearth deck.
0
Posted 08 January 2009 at 06:56

Permalink

I don't know...It's still pretty bad XD You normally want to have at least 1 card in hand to bluff or something and if you don't, it tends to be hazardous.
0
Posted 10 January 2009 at 23:24

Permalink

[QUOTE=SolArc]I don't know...It's still pretty bad XD You normally want to have at least 1 card in hand to bluff or something and if you don't, it tends to be hazardous.[/QUOTE]

Some people I know have played decks revolving around their graveyard
0
Posted 11 January 2009 at 00:49

Permalink

ashling is a nearly totally useless card the ability actually makes her worse rather than better unless you can find a way to give her a solid form off evasion eg flying or trample fear is not really strong enough as most decks i have seen and used run with some black mainly for extra destruction
0
Posted 25 February 2009 at 12:19

Permalink

honestly, ashling is a very good card, especially since it has ties in the eventide set to green, i.e. tramples biggest color. or for example in a new shards deck with blue red black, that gives easy unblockable or flying mechanics. ashling is far from the worst card. far far from the worst card. not to mention that it is a 4/4 for 2BB which is just a 4/4 for 4 in a monoblack deck when if you think about it, black creatures usually run more expensive
0
Posted 26 February 2009 at 00:07

Permalink

i kinda get where your coming from but in all honesty ashling still seems like a massive waste off space 4/4 with trample isnt much of a threat espeacially as you have the hatchlings boggart ram gangs yeah ram gand is only a 3/3 but its on the 3rd turn and makes ashling a 1/1
and also in all honesty the new shards and conflux sets are really crap (id say worse things but might bet banned) hey can have amazing synergy but even after spending nearly 100 pounds on a jund and bant deck they only ever beat my other decks one time in every ten or so games shards is good to play against shard deck but it rellys to heavily on manna fixing
0
Posted 03 March 2009 at 11:00

Permalink

I am going to assume you are English, due to the pound system. i find the grammar and misspelling funny. Oh and the shards decks are not bad. They have quite a few bad ass cards that can be used in many situations. In block vs. block, it doesn't really stand on its own, but the final expansion is still in the works. You never know what may happen.
0
Posted 03 March 2009 at 21:12

Permalink

lol yeah my spelling and grammer is a bit terible but ive never really tried to improve it and yes you are right that the shards do have some very strong cards its just a litle on the slow side (again speling etc)
0
Posted 05 March 2009 at 12:30

Permalink

I vote for personal incarnation, see below for reason why

http://www.cardkingdom.com/card_viewer.php?sid=210793837&pid=26188

if it wasnt a 6/6 for 6 then it might b decent but mana cost and the fact that could b destroyed easily make it worthless in my eyes
0
Posted 06 March 2009 at 01:54

Permalink

Ok i just hate how people use the "dies to removal" argument, Lets see whats better Goyf(i know it's not really comparable but still) or a 2/2 with shroud... wich would you wether play in your deck? An essentially 6/7 for 2 or a 2/2 with shroud for 2. I know which one i would play. Dying to removal sucks, but thats what removal is for to kill creatures. If your a good magic player then you'll find a way to get around it, i.e not building your deck around one creature. Or just put a couple counter spells in. Well my rant is over so yeah.

My vote for the worst card ever is madblind mountain.... i try to play it but its just like a dead card.
0
Posted 07 April 2009 at 01:48

Permalink

well magic the gathering goes in cycles of fast and slow sets and with the prev. sets creating an over surplus of powerful weennie decks i belive that wizards sought to mix things up and make everything slower.personaly i like it becuase its great for the naya beat deck i play (its on the main site also note if you dont think it has enough mana excel i agree so i play more) because against decks like wwkithkin i always used to lose but no one plays that any more. btw check out goblin bomb both on the forum and the site, i would like to play it at fnm its type 2 and i would like your advice please.
0
Posted 10 April 2009 at 16:40

Permalink

[QUOTE=Masta Moore]Scornful Egotist...That is amazing. I've never seen anything that...bad...[/QUOTE]

look back on the onslaught block, you can counter any spell with dispersal shield, burn for seven with torrent of flame and there was a bunch of other cards that just became ultra powerful if scornful egotist was on the field, plus it has morph you only need three lands on the field to play it.

Chimney imp is the worst card ever. five mana for a 1/2 flyer that when he deals combat damage to a player that player puts a card from their hand on top of their library.
0
Posted 02 June 2009 at 03:18

Permalink

[QUOTE=MagicMan514]Moonlace U
Instant TS-R
Target spell or permanent becomes colorless until end of turn.[/QUOTE]

It'll Kick Progenitus back to where he came from :P
0
Posted 23 November 2009 at 04:52

Permalink