My competitive standard RE-RE-..

by hipponox on 26 November 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (5)

Sorceries (2)


Instants (8)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

okay. here it is again. any help would be appreciated. please help!!! thanks : )

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 678 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1640004

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for My competitive standard RE-RE-RE-revised (HELP!)

As I said before, I really can't help you because I have no experience with these kinds of decks. It does look quite well rounded, though.

0
Posted 26 November 2009 at 12:18

Permalink

My advice to you is to take the deck apart and start over... if your running white blue it should have meddling mages emeria angels honor of the pure knight of the white orchid ect... not to mention you need to get glacial fortresses on top of that.

0
Posted 26 November 2009 at 12:51

Permalink

don't have the money to run glacial fortress, thats another 40 bucks

0
Posted 26 November 2009 at 13:00

Permalink

and i have knight of the white orchid and honor of the pure but decided not to run them cuz it wasn't what i was going for. o and wall of reverence is supposed to be wall of denial

0
Posted 26 November 2009 at 13:01

Permalink

Buddy, As Much as I support your choice to play blue/white..... WHY? Black is the way to go xD

0
Posted 26 November 2009 at 18:16

Permalink

dude, i have no idea. im completely frustrated with this whole thing right now. i can't seem to make it work. i think im gonna start from scratch.

0
Posted 27 November 2009 at 00:23

Permalink

thanks to everyone who commented though

0
Posted 27 November 2009 at 00:23

Permalink