Am I cheating???

by Ixionnoixi on 22 January 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Nothing serious. I just saw a lot of cheat cards today and was like... ya know, why not. So here it is.

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 964 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

840424

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Am I cheating???

Pretty good deck for what you set out to make. The only card you're missing is Deathrender.

0
Posted 22 January 2013 at 07:27

Permalink

I noticed Deathrender when I put the deck together and I was like: Hmmm, I'd have to have a creature die and... I can't reliably do that so, I guess I'll go with the others. But now, I realize I do have 4 nest invaders and with that, 4 sac-able eldrazi tokens to use but... it's still seems a bit hopeful I should say to run into both cards quick enough. Thanks for the reminder though. I may change some things around.

0
Posted 22 January 2013 at 17:42

Permalink

More like "cheaping" ......... lol

0
Posted 22 January 2013 at 08:42

Permalink

Using Quicksilver Amulet to play Emrakul without casting is the worst idea. You don't get the free turn to start wiping your opponents board. If you really want to do something like this, find a way to get haste as you put creatures in play or it's not very effective.

0
Posted 22 January 2013 at 12:08

Permalink

I agree that it works the worst for him however, this applies to almost all the cards in here and not just Quicksilver amulet. Emrakul is still completely worth it however and though I could use other creatures instead, just the chance to hit Through the Breach is enough to warrant him. I did want field haste myself but I ran out of room. Simply don't know what to take out as it does become a search fest. You have to or it isn't reliable enough.

0
Posted 22 January 2013 at 17:46

Permalink

I think it works best for Ulamog since he's indestructible and destroying 1 permanent doesn't matter much when you're fairly certain he'll stick around to annihilate. With protection from colored spells, Emrakul has a chance of sticking around, but there are plenty of wraths/field effects that can be used to make him a detriment. Meanwhile, Kozilek gets shipped to the worst possible card to put into play. He can be removed, shut down, and more. To top it off, the cards main purpose is to draw cards and since you're ignoring that by just placing him into play, it goes without saying that running 4 kozilek to 2 ulamog with this decks structure is counterproductive.

0
Posted 23 January 2013 at 02:23

Permalink

Yup. I agree and am changing Kozilek to Darksteel colossus.

0
Posted 23 January 2013 at 02:39

Permalink