Oh, you can't damage me?

by izdaisho on 02 June 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

I was planning on making an enchantment deck with lots of draws and then randomly stumbled on pariah. Combine that with inviolability or temporal Isolation and you can't lose life.

Not sure if this deck can win even in a friendly match but it definitely looks like alot of fun.

Any suggestions to make it more fun or better would be great.

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,866 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

2900020

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Oh, you can't damage me?

Im sure the deck would be good fun against certain decks, but almost everyone I know plays with lots of Enchantment destruction, so i don't know how long you would be able to keep it up. If you can find a way to give the creature and enchantments shroud you could just sit there the whole game and laugh as your opponent fails to hurt you. Watch out for Mill decks though, not gunna be much help there. And do you know the rulings for Infect damage? would you still take poison counters from infect creatures? awesome combo though!

0
Posted 02 June 2011 at 07:58

Permalink

Yeah that's what I was thinking.

I had a solution for milling which was wheel of sun and moon. Probably a good card for my side board.

Harder to find a solution to enchantment destruction. Could put in sterling grove but then that would only mean they'd have to destroy that first. I guess if I have two sterling groves at the same time then there is literally nothing they could do.

0
Posted 02 June 2011 at 08:14

Permalink

Is this like aura deck?

0
Posted 19 October 2012 at 23:38

Permalink