Paralyzing Birds (Budget)

by Janicsar on 03 May 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Tags

  • Bird
  • Flying
  • fly
  • paralyze
  • Enchantment
  • Budget
  • 10

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,260 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

3022000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Paralyzing Birds (Budget)

Simple but seems pretty effective and only about $10. Nicely done.

0
Posted 03 May 2013 at 21:40

Permalink

jrc603 has deleted this comment.

Posted 03 May 2013 at 21:44

Permalink

If you have two pacifism or arrest in your hand, you don't need Magnus, and he is too expensive for this deck:)

0
Posted 04 May 2013 at 09:02

Permalink

Check out squadron hawk, adding 4 of them to this deck would be pretty nice! Would probably go for 1 more favorable winds too

1
Posted 03 May 2013 at 23:24

Permalink

Yep squadron hawk is a good idea! Thanks!

0
Posted 04 May 2013 at 09:03

Permalink

Oh yeah, I really like Augury owl too! Also I realised that card cowed by wisdom you use really works well with the squadron hawks too!

1
Posted 04 May 2013 at 09:13

Permalink

oh yeah! Hard combo for 11 dollars!:D

0
Posted 04 May 2013 at 09:23

Permalink

I would switch out Lantern Kami for Judge's Familiar for more control.
Overall a nice and effective deck! :D

1
Posted 12 May 2013 at 22:03

Permalink

thanks man ! Judge's Familiar is much better than Kami!

1
Posted 13 May 2013 at 12:18

Permalink

Your welcome!
Glad I was able to help :)

1
Posted 14 May 2013 at 00:21

Permalink

https://www.mtgvault.com/card/skycat-sovereign/IKO/ is a great card and still pretty budget. Plus it pumps itself!

2
Posted 29 November 2021 at 17:24

Permalink

Heh, if you haven't noticed, someones been necroing old posts.
I (almost) always read the date of the last comment to avoid being the first one to comment on an old conversation
:)

-1
Posted 29 November 2021 at 22:50

Permalink

Please don't talk to me, or otherwise engage in discussion with me.

2
Posted 29 November 2021 at 22:52

Permalink

What?
For telling you that you are talking with noone ?
What an odd reaction...

-1
Posted 29 November 2021 at 22:54

Permalink

Because I asked politely. And I have respect for other people when they make requests of me, and I hope for the same respect from them.

1
Posted 29 November 2021 at 22:56

Permalink

Well, you are responding to a post from 2013 that someones just been upvoting. About 20 recent decks been splashed over the site this way, exactly with the purpose of getting people to comment on "nothing".

-1
Posted 29 November 2021 at 23:02

Permalink

Could also be because you guys are back at trawling the old posts for information.
Right and11, or should I call you andreas ???

Ah, I get it.
You suggested skycat sovereign as a new code card, I see how you guys have used it a lot in the past.
The 20 other decks were just covering for your suggestion, but I sort of read them all you know...

I could also call you anda brun.
Keep up your little treasure hunts, and try to be less hostile, I would have missed this one if you had responded with a "woops, didn't see the date there" instead your anger issues gave me more info...

-2
Posted 29 November 2021 at 23:16

Permalink

I have no part in either your, or your perceived opposition, shenanigan's. You're clearly mentally ill, and obviously have too much time on your hands. But that doesn't mean I want to take part in either harming or encouraging you. I would simply prefer that you simply not interact with me. That doesn't seem to be too difficult of a barrier-you do your thing, I will do my own and from this point forward I'll no longer interact with you. (Which is the same thing I do when I encounter other obviously mentally ill people online. You clearly have enough problems and I don't need to contribute to them, nor do I take any humor or solace in watching your performance.)

1
Posted 30 November 2021 at 01:00

Permalink

You people already tried that approach before.
Anyways sure, we can ignore each other here, because in the end the picture I'll paint outside of mtgvault will carry much more personal satisfaction. If you really isn't any of those real life guys I'm investigating, then you will obviously never be part of a police investigation :)

To everyone else...

The code word that identifies this spammers is "ious"
He's been changing from calling himself "anda" to use ious, and typically the group of thieves uses a transition where the rest of the group gets to see his new "keyword"
Which is why he used the account: andarious
Lately he's been behind nubtorious performing lots of spam.

But his real name is now known to me, thanx for the screwup :)

-2
Posted 30 November 2021 at 06:21

Permalink