jmac640

17 Decks, 77 Comments, 3 Reputation

It's not necessary. There's enough fire power as there is. The idea of this deck is to swarm. similar to elfs.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 16:57 in reply to #137780 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

It's good, but you can't have vamps w/o hexmage and gatekeepers.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 14:23 as a comment on Vampires (Done Properly)

Permalink

Vampires have to be straight black in my opinion! that defeats the purpose. I could get rid of the assassin for something though

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 14:20 in reply to #137758 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

Fixed that issue

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 14:17 in reply to #137013 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

Yeah it would work better, but It just seems a lot more fun to control.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 12:41 in reply to #137714 on Angelic control

Permalink

you should go standard with it. you're only missing a couple cards. replace Elspeth with Elspeth Tirel. Spectral procession with white sun's zenith, and windbrisk heights.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 11:30 as a comment on overblown weenie

Permalink

True conviction if for late game. I don't expect to play it much, but as insurance it's there. All the knights are cheap so It can't hurt to have some power. Also the side board is there so you can always switch things in or out.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 10:53 in reply to #137385 on Hot Knights!

Permalink

How's it looking now? I put in the accorder paladin's and arid mesa.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 10:48 in reply to #137664 on Hot Knights!

Permalink

I like it, my only thing is I don't like contested war zone. It has potential to backfire.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 10:37 as a comment on White Knights and Hot Fire

Permalink

I really like my deck as is. Everyone has good ideas, but it's hard to pull this out replace that here you know? The only problem with the deck was the inconsistent land base, so I will be fixing that with some fetch lands. Thanks for all suggestions.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 09:48 as a comment on Vampiric touch

Permalink

Yes it is standard otherwise the nocturnus would be right there. I had to put in captivating vampire to try and suffice.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 15:46 in reply to #137417 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

Good suggestion, but I don't have any. Also, I don't think I need that much mana flowing.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 15:12 in reply to #137403 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

I would make one suggestion. Jace Beleren. Only because draw power rocks. Also I don't think n/e one could afford jace, the mind sculptor. :(

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:35 in reply to #137392 on Magosi Mill deck

Permalink

I'm not a fan of control, but when I play it I would do something like that. Have you played this in tournament??

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:33 as a comment on Magosi Mill deck

Permalink

Thanks for the suggestions. You kinda murdered the deck, but hey it was for the better. I did make a few changes. Comment if you wanna.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:21 in reply to #137385 on Hot Knights!

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=156093
Something like this is really useful. Of course it's ur choice.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:07 as a comment on White Knights

Permalink

That's a good tip. I could def. put those in sideboard and switch out things. Thanks.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 13:56 in reply to #137382 on Hot Knights!

Permalink

Yeah elixir is a bitch! That's what the leyline of the voids are for. Also I put this deck up looking for Sideboard things. Thanks :)

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 10:52 in reply to #137310 on Liliana has her way

Permalink

I would, but I don't like losing my elves.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 10:40 in reply to #137292 on Elvish Beatdown

Permalink

Thanks for the comment, but this deck is just for shits and giggles. The fact that it works is the funny part.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 10:38 in reply to #137242 on Ajani and Friends :3

Permalink

41-60 of 76 items