Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Deck is basically a counter/burn deck. I once placed 2nd in a 30+ man tourney with a similar deck. That was 10 years ago, more new cards to be used now and its much better than ever. Burn them, search your libraries for what you need, burn them more, take more turns, burn them, counter whatever they got, burn, search, counter, burn. Please comment on deck, open for suggestions and improvements. I viewed almost all cards of the MTG world for the newer stuff. Im sure I could be missing a few things. updated on nov. 30th 2009
This deck has been viewed 2,941 times.
How yah playin' Yawgmoth's mah friend?
Permalink
thanks for mentioning that, ill edit the deck. originally i had 4 city of brass' to play the yawgmoth, demonic tutor and vampiric tutor. i didnt mind adding those cards since it required a mere 1 black mana and colorless was a nonfactor. i had taken out these cards, forgot the yawgmoth. i could probably just add a mox jet, replace some lands for gemstone mines/undiscovered paradise.
well i just added the mox jet for now making it a 61 card deck. its not much but im tired and ill re-do it later. just dont play the jet until its time. if it doesnt work out, then it doesnt. i think there's a blue card that can bring back artifacts from teh grave so if anything would kill the jet or force you to discard, use the card to bring it back.
This deck needs more consistancy as well as my decks.
hahahahaha. everyone who views this deck here, dont forget to click "jamesgrim17" and be the judge of consistency. james could you clarify on 'consistency' for me please?
i have updated the deck after learning of new cards to add to it. peep it.
"james could you clarify on 'consistency' for me please? " in magic terms, 'consistency' refers to the odds of drawing any given card...a deck with many single cards will be less consistent than a deck where there's less different cards but more copies of each. a deck with many singles is usually a symptom that the deck doesn't have a real focus, that it tries to do too much and ends up doing not much at all.
exactly. now seras did you read what these one cards are in my deck?? theyre restricted type1. if you read them then you realize it doesnt matter if theyre singles, why? because they fetch you cards and condition your hand to get what you need. sadly most ppl assume that having alot of singles in their deck means failure. however in james case, its highly different. the odds of success for his blatantly fails compared to mines. only 17 lands? is this a shock? i notice most ppl put at least 20. why is there 17? all it takes is a time vault and a voltaic key. the game is over. even without this combo, there are cards to help reinforce this deck in so many ways. seras im curious, are you referring that this deck is inconsistent? if you are, you did not read its content. please explain if you are.
I was explaining the term since you didn't seem to get what he meant. not sure why you're so defensive/sensitive about this.
im not sensitive and i knew what it mean. its okay, its hard to detect sarcasm on the internet.