Angels and Demons

by Kayin on 28 May 2010

Main Deck (66 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

T2 Angel and Demon Deck.

It needs some work - with only T2 restrictions, how can I shape this deck up a bit?
- What can I add to beef up the deck:?
- Hows my Mana? Swap out lands for others?
- What should I take out?

I can replace pretty much any card with any other - i.e Battlegrace with Baneslayer ect ect.

Cheers!

Edit:
Took out the Halo Hunters in Place of Linvala
Threw in 3 Wall of Omens - Go to 4?
Need to still take some cards out... I dont Want to get rid of Hellcarver.. I know it doesnt exactly fit, but I love it. Its ablity is just way to cool.

Also -1 Xathrid? Or take out completely? I want to try and keep a good balance of Angels and Demons

Maybe take out 2 Battle Grace and 3 Guard Seraph for 4 Baneslayer? Thoughts?

Also - What good sorcery would be good to run with his deck? Ive got some removal but I dont know what would be more appropriate / help the deck.

Thanks!

Deck Tags

  • Theme

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 12,327 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

5302900

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Angels and Demons

put more land in your deck

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 15:59

Permalink

please comment on my zombie deck

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 16:00

Permalink

BANESLAYA! :p

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 16:59

Permalink

Word. Take out the Battlegrace for 2 and then drop... what else. Perimeter captain?

0
Posted 28 May 2010 at 19:05

Permalink

1. Take about the battlegrace, if you want a powerful combonation of shit, try exalted angels/demons, that's some powerful ish.
2. Take out Halo Hunter, that's an angel killer, if you're playing with someone whom doesn't have an angel, that's on of your angels you gotta sacrifice when he comes in.
3. The hellcarver demon will not work too good with transcendant master, as you need lands to level him up. Hellcarver demon screws all that up for you.
4. Where's the baneslayer angels?
5. Why so many Abyssal Persecutor's?
6. Xathrid demon is not a good choice.
Man, re-look at this deck. I don't see this deck working out good at all. That's just my opinion. Good luck though.

0
Posted 30 May 2010 at 21:21

Permalink

All sounds good.
I want to get as many solid Demons and Angels into one deck. Hence why there are a lot of skills and abilities that dont mesh well. Any thoughts? I want to keep it all T2.

Any other thoughts for Demons? Ive racked my brain, but Im so limited. Demons are often high cost and just as painful for you as for the opponent.

0
Posted 31 May 2010 at 02:11

Permalink

Honestly, the main ones you should take out are probably Halo Hunter, Xathrid Demon, Transcendant Master, I dunno man. I've tried making a good angel/demon deck..it's hard as fuck, possible, but really hard. Just think of the unthinkable..example..
You use Hellcarver demons ability, you draw 6 cards, remarkably, 1 Xathrid Demon, and 5 lands. The next turn, your hellcarver demon is destroyed because Xathrid feels he's too good to be teaming up with that badass demon. So then Xathrid is the only thing on the feild, and slowly killing you. Or, if you finally got out Iona, and boom, you pull out Halo Hunter. You just sacrificed your 7/7 for a 6/3 and your opponent is just roffling when he uses a lightning bolt on Halo Hunter. Make sure nothing contradicts itself in the deck. with angels and demons...hard thing to pull..even the 2 names are contradictory LOL. But you can do this man.

I love hellcarver demon and its abilities. I fell inlove instantly once I seen the art LOL It's totaly underrated, but oh so amazing.

0
Posted 02 June 2010 at 01:29

Permalink