The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
I know there's some cards in here, that are like wtf, but they're just fill in. The deck works fairly well. I get a pretty sick turn one.
Aim for getting Channel, in your opening hand. To mulligan, might be a good idea. Having eight cards in the deck, producing an extra green mana on turn one, seems to be fairly efficient. Lots of gross turn one drops...
This deck has been viewed 1,615 times.
WOw. THis deck truly is just a turn one fuck you. Lol. Now I want to make it myself! XD
Permalink
As a note; Channel is only legal in Freeform and Prismatic. It's restricted in others too. If this deck is Freeform then you should only run 40 cards to guarantee your combo better.On to why I really posted; in legacy and vintage, there are plenty of turn-1 win decks that have nothing to deal with Eldrazi so I find it insulting that you believe this deck has a chance to compete.I'd also like to point out that if you were playing this as a 40-card freeform version, then you should accept that there are other decks that are even more broken than this one. If you hope to compete then you better make sure you have Emrakul always... then again there are even 0-mana ways to deal with him.
Well I find your arrogant snobbery insulting.On to why I really posted; this is a great deck and I would hate to have to play against (due to the overwhelming number of asses it thoroughly kicks). I'd also like to point out that people who would put decks down like this should really just not bother to talk at all and put their heads right back up their asses. It's one thing to offer constructed criticism, but another thing entirely to put a deck down without even offering any helpful advice. It's people like you who would stifle others' creativity. So please stop ruining the fun
I was not and am not trying to look down on it. If you read my reply then you would see that I was explaining that freeforms are 40-card minimum decks, as well as that your win condition, Channel, makes this deck freeform.Sure, I said that in legacy/vintage there are plenty of turn1 win decks without Eldrazi but I don't see how that is a problem. At the end I said that I find this deck insulting about it having a chance to compete. Let me ask you a simple question: Would you like tournaments to be just people running this single deck? If you consider how powerful the deck is, and consider it a good deck, then you're asking that to be the case. It's a "whoever goes first wins" game. It's why wizards banned and restricted Channel; to make the game not a 1-deck wins all games deck.I comment honestly and realistically. I'd love to see this prepared in a realistic way for a tournament even. As it is, it's just another joke deck for MTGVault or maybe just a deck to play with someone who doesn't know the ban listings.I've seen plenty of legacy and vintage decks running a single Channel and multiple tutors. Those decks are the fun ones because if you compare them to this one, it's not just an "I win, in your face!" deck, they have an equal chance to win as any other deck.
Are you seriously gonna tell me that you don't see what's wrong with finding it insulting that someone believes in their deck?You've got to be kidding
I only believe in decks that people can say things like "I had fun playing against that deck." This isn't about just playing with a small group of friends that you always play with, it's about enjoying the game with whoever you play with, even if you just met them for the first time today.
Your argument makes no sense... or, rather, is irrelevant to my point.
Well Chaos, I am unaware of anyone who plays 40 card decks. Indeed, there is legality issues with Channel, for a card that flips for under a buck, I am thoroughly satisfied.
That's fine. I can honestly see you playing this against un-decks for fun. :)
Sniff sniff... What were you saying, I was doing a line of coke off the Master Transmuter's etherium ass.
RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry I wanted to get involved in the anger fest.......
lol turn one plays dark rit then putrid imp uses ability puts blazing archon in grave then exumes it to the field i no have to scoop lol easy fixanyway i think the reason chaos is insulted is you are assuming that your opponent will have nothing to defend themselve while i do applaud the ingeniousness of your deck i do think it cant hurt to be a bit more humble about it
I am aware that there are decks that can fire off hard on turn one. However, the proba ility is commonly a lesser. He is upset, because I used a broken banned card. I think channell is a great card, for those who do not wish to spend lots of cash. I am also aware that Path to exile, can seriously fuck up ninety percent of my creatures, leaving me low on life. This deck is just for fun. I was incapable of detecting, how serious people were going to get about the name. I built the de k as a joke, ot cost me two whole dollars, for the channels, that made my booster box of eldrazi, interesting on a comical level. Chaos is correct, it is a joke. I only argued with him, because he was whining like a mule in heat. My next deck will be called turn zero scoop,it will be filled with expensive cards and no mana to play them.