Deck Removal

by Krin on 25 March 2008

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (4 cards)

Instants (4)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Trying to make a good deck remover deck, advice would be appreciated.

Deck Tags

  • Discard

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 718 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0242600

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Deck Removal

Hmm, what happens when your enemy plays a fat trampler? The deck has no options against that, except in the sideboard. To me the deck has too much fluff - conditional power spells like force spike, daze & hoodwink may be dead cards. Once you've emptied your opponent's hand, then the discard spells become useless. It is okay to move away from the theme a little to be more robust. I'd pick some good bounce spells(Equilibrium?) to get some anti-creature options and look for some card draw.

0
Posted 25 March 2008 at 07:49

Permalink

Check out my deck named "Dimir the lights in the library" It's by no means perfect, but once it gets rockin it's pretty nasty. Might give you a few ideas.

0
Posted 26 March 2008 at 01:52

Permalink

Glimpse the Unthinkable isn't in my deck, it should be, but I don't have any. Perplex is a great card, counters a spell unless your opponent discards their whole hand, and if you don't need it you can transmute it for anything with the same converted mana cost.

0
Posted 26 March 2008 at 01:54

Permalink

You might want to check out what "megrim" does if the point of your deck is to bounce your opponents cards and then make them discard with a follow up spell. All you have to do is get them to discard 10 times in most cases. It is often faster than the traditional milling methods.

0
Posted 26 March 2008 at 03:53

Permalink