Vampires (block constructed by..

by lokiluck on 17 June 2010

Main Deck (63 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

This deck was featured on Pro Tour San-Jaun deck tech.

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,378 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

006300

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Vampires (block constructed by Gerry Thompson)

Deck looks sweet.The only thing is I would drop the Marsh Flats. This is a mono black deck so fetching shouldn't be necessary. Add 1 Anowon, the Ruin Sage, and you'll have an even 60 cards to pop those Abyssal Persecutors once their job is done. Did this deck win? If not, the these simple mods should take the game further.

0
Posted 17 June 2010 at 19:48

Permalink

You know he can use gatekeeper to get rid of the protectors, right? It's "target player", so he just spends three and Voila, no protector! I agree, however, that marsh flats is useless.

0
Posted 17 June 2010 at 20:35

Permalink

If it were me, I wouldn't waste Gatekeeper's ability solely on getting rid of the persecutors. Though that could work.

0
Posted 21 June 2010 at 12:53

Permalink

the marsh flats are awesome in this deck. like in all decks it thins it out, and it works great with bloodghast. just imagine a bloodghast and a kalastria highborn on the battlefiled.

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 21:53

Permalink

I think the marsh flats are to get bloodghast out onto the field late game and I didn't include the side bored but I think there might be a reason for it in the side board. It did pretty well, but he didn't make top 8 i think he made top 16. It was a featured deck on deck tech

0
Posted 20 June 2010 at 17:00

Permalink

Nah. Let's say I had 4 Bloodghast in the graveyard. I would only need 1 land drop to bring back all 4 Bloodghast on the field.

0
Posted 21 June 2010 at 12:51

Permalink

The fetch lands (Verdant Catacombs and Marsh Flats) are probably there to thin out the deck, so in late game you're drawing relevant cards instead of swamps. What I'd like to know is why it's a 63 card deck; perhaps it makes it more efficient somehow?

0
Posted 21 June 2010 at 06:07

Permalink

I probably screwed up just alittle when i did the input. It is suppose to be a 61 card deck.

0
Posted 23 June 2010 at 11:03

Permalink

I would consider 3x feast of blood and 2x tendrils of corruption instead of disfigure / hideous end / smother. No color restriction to the creatures you kill + lifegain.

0
Posted 22 June 2010 at 13:11

Permalink

This is a block constructed deck, and those are all M10 cards hence why they are not in the deck

0
Posted 23 June 2010 at 11:03

Permalink

cool check mine out http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=71341

0
Posted 26 June 2010 at 05:04

Permalink