MakzNovak

4 Decks, 8 Comments, 0 Reputation

As plenty of others will tell you, too many singles. Also there doesn't seem too be much of a strategy. From what I know of Vampires, there's so many abilities and different things they can do. But they don't all work together. You should try to make it more of a centralized strategy.

0
Posted 25 August 2011 at 19:34 as a comment on Vampires suck!

Permalink

That's what I was saying.

0
Posted 17 August 2011 at 05:24 in reply to #192578 on Standard Jund

Permalink

Because it's Standard?

0
Posted 15 August 2011 at 21:53 in reply to #192578 on Standard Jund

Permalink

Thank you for your feedback!

I like that idea. I'll definitely figure out a way to put that in.

0
Posted 14 August 2011 at 03:25 in reply to #191676 on Elf aggro/beatdown

Permalink

I used to use that. I made a Sanguine Bond deck. But now it's aggro. That is an amazing combo, but not for this deck.

0
Posted 02 July 2010 at 16:24 in reply to #72195 on Type 2 Vampire Aggro (M11 involved)

Permalink

Feast is not terrible at all. Yeah, it's a sorcery, and yeah you have to have 2 vamps out but in a vamp deck that nothing. Urge is good too, but feast is not terrible at all.

0
Posted 02 July 2010 at 13:51 in reply to #50440 on Vampire Aggro

Permalink

Thanks for the feedback guys.

I've been thinking about taking out Anowon. But, idk if I'm gonna go with Malakir Bloodwitch or something like Butcher of Malakir.

I've also added Viscera Seer (which if you having seen in Daily MTG, is one black for a 1/1 Vampire with "Sac a creature, scry 1".) I've found that with the sac I sac Bloodghast to scry, then if it's a land put it on bottom and play Nocturnus, then play my land for the turn to get Ghast back. If they have 10 life it works amazingly.

0
Posted 02 July 2010 at 13:35 as a comment on Type 2 Vampire Aggro (M11 involved)

Permalink