Homicidal Fixation

by malignantmatt on 01 March 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

everyone attack!!!!!!

Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Some die with a whimper and others with a bang!!! I can't stop them so the best thing to do is stay out of their way.

How to Play

I wanted to put all the creatures that must attack each turn into one deck. I have played it a few times. It is a lot of fun. The looks you get for doing this is well worth it.

Anyone have suggestions I what would make this even more fun.

The secret to doing well with this deck is attacking first before playing any spells. you may have to use showstopper or kill suit's ability or regenerate a creature. then in the 2nd main phase you can play another creature or add an enchantment on their creature. if the opponent sees lust for war on his creature he will block with it and kill it off.

Deck Tags

  • brutal
  • Beatdown
  • Modern

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 706 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

008320

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Homicidal Fixation

I really like the idea of a deck full of creatures that have to attack, that seems like a very fun theme, and if you're just looking for pure fun and not too concerned about win/lose ratio or mechanics (which is perfectly fine) you can ignore the rest of my comment. If you are looking for improvements, I would suggest not going quite so heavy on the creatures (even though it can be soooooo easy to do and I often find myself having to comb through decks again and break down the numbers). Since this is almost a mono-red deck I would HIGHLY recommend replacing some creatures with some quick burn spells (Lightning Bolt is a favorite). I actually have a mono-red deck posted on here which, although it is not just creatures that have to attack, it has kind of a similar idea--just get that damage in and do it fast! My deck is part burn, and I find that having the support of the burn spells helps me take out the blockers the other player throws out relatively well. I also would recommend ditching the black simply because there's barely any in there (which could mana screw you in the long run) and those partial black cards are not needed. I know this creature doesn't have to attack, but Rakdos Shred Freak (which is hybrid mana, so you still don't need the black) can be nasty for a 2-drop, especially if you can buff him...which brings me to my next point. Buff these guys up! If they have to attack every turn, rather than have them drop like flies from people blocking, throw in some nasty buffers and either have your opponent decide to take the damage to save his creature or have him losing creatures left and right. I would recommend Madcap Skills. Hope this helps :)

1
Posted 16 March 2014 at 22:49

Permalink

Yes the deck is for fun and instead of burn spells like you suggested, I used spells like wring flesh, lose hope, etc. spells that gave minuses to opponents creatures for assured kills. When I was posting this I guess I did get too excited and focused only on the creatures and not at all on the instants. So instead of the buff, I went with the subtract. The only reason I did that is the buff spells were currently being used in a really good deck(s) and I all I had left unused was the minus spells.

Another idea I had for this was to use walls that have heavy powers and the enchantments to force the opponent attack. along with that I was going to use the world enchantments that forced the opponent to lose life ever time they attacked. That idea was quickly scrapped and went in favor of the -x/-x spells and these guys, and after a few plays through that version, this is what I ultimately decided on. Instead of focus on winning I went with frustrating the opponent.

Surprisingly (to me especially), it doesn't lose as often as you would think. But when it does lose its an epic loss or a hard fought battle from your opponent. the group I play with, we favor originality and humor over win/loss ratios. One of my friends decided I should call this the 'apology' deck. because that is what I have to do after it has been played.

If you check out some of my other decks you can see i do know what I am doing but I also enjoy having fun with this as well. I appreciate the feedback. Thanks.

0
Posted 16 March 2014 at 23:15

Permalink