RG Valakut Ramp

by Moeba_Beats on 04 August 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Win with Valakut or Comet Storm. Kazuul helps too.

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,120 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0002016

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for RG Valakut Ramp

that is weird i just posted a deck called death by lands right before or at the same time you did is there really nothin to look for non-basic lands besides expedition map? well and besides primeval titan? i like the comet storm idea as well

0
Posted 05 August 2010 at 00:24

Permalink

your going to need more green sources than 7. 15 Mountains is far too many. You only need say 11 to get the job done, so i suggest some raging ravines or just more expanses and evolving wilds. Also kazull and the oracle really arnt great, they will just eat all those spot removal cards that were dead in your opponents hand otherwise. Try rampant growth and another burn spell such as searing blaze instead (Its great after a harrow in your opponents turn)

0
Posted 05 August 2010 at 08:51

Permalink

Rampant Growth isn't in standard once m10 rotates. Also, I am NOT taking kazuul out. He is just too good against Jund (and aggro in general). But I might replace Oracle (probably not though).
Oh, and 15 mountains is just the right ammount; I did a ton of testing, and 11 just isn't enough. Neither is 12. Or 13. I always run out of "ammo" if my opponent has a lot of removal targets.

0
Posted 05 August 2010 at 22:34

Permalink

Kazull is good against jund??? What with all those Terminates and probably pulses and maybe bit blasts that would be either dead or not as good if you didnt have any creatures at all?

Also you obviously havnt playtested this enough. I have, and having only 7 green sources means you probably wont be expeditioning on turn 2, which is your best play. Also you only need 4 mountains, and since you have all 4 maps you'll probably have 4 valakuts, so you can just burn them out in a turn, even with only 11 mountains, thats 28 damage.

0
Posted 06 August 2010 at 08:14

Permalink

I really like th use of kazuul in this deck, i think he is a very underrated rare. I personally own a playset just in case ^^

Pyroclasm doesnt really seem to fit well, i mean if you go off fast enough you shouldnt worry about creature control. I ran a valakut ramp deck a while ago and i used alot more creatures in it. On the list i included: RAmpaging baloths, avenger of zendikar, grazing gladeheart, and coisi's ravager. They make alternate win-conditions and provide protection

0
Posted 09 August 2010 at 22:07

Permalink

Needs Primeval titan bad.

0
Posted 19 August 2010 at 00:05

Permalink

dude my valakut deck is better =b not posted on this site but it dosent run creatures and wins on turn 4

0
Posted 23 August 2010 at 17:04

Permalink

dude my valakut deck is better =b not posted on this site but it dosent run creatures and wins on turn 4

0
Posted 23 August 2010 at 17:11

Permalink

No Valakut deck should be without Primeval Titan and Rampant Growth. Removal is best for sideboard.

0
Posted 01 September 2010 at 11:12

Permalink