The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
This deck has been viewed 838 times.
the deck would work, the only thing to keep in mind is what was talked about in the other discussion. the less cards needed for a combo the better. these are all just fun decks for the most part unless you had the balls to actually play in a tourney with this( which it would probably just get beat out by an agro or T1 deck). combos are always super fun in theory but sometimes not really worth it.here is my build for the simic deckhttp://www.mtgvault.com/kidgrim/decks/gilder-combo-winmodern/here is a supper cheap modern deck that doesn't cost more than 15 bucks if u put duress in for thoughtseize (this is just an example of a simple junk deck that is effective and cheap!)http://www.mtgvault.com/kidgrim/decks/modern-discard/
Permalink
you know what modern FNM is on the last Friday of every month here, i take your comment as a challenge!I like your discard deck, but i already made one like that i want to try out...but yours does seem good, i have hread people say hand attack is really viable in modern!Your deck is certainly more focused than mine! mine has about 3 combos in, i just cant pick what one i want to use >.< OH and the sideboard is meant to be, transformative, not reactive, i guess that makes it weaker against other decks as I cant really respond to them...
well its best to play test and see what u like best rather than jam everything into one deck hahaand yes as cool as it is to switch your game plan with a sideboard like that, it is better to have a reactive sideboard to deal with things that might create issues for the deck( I just build the gilder deck this morning after looking it over last night)this is the current deck I play for modern....http://www.mtgvault.com/kidgrim/decks/american-twin-modern-combo/it is expensive and it wins about 90% of the time, iv topped with it more times than I can count. But...... it can get boring and I know not everyone wants to just throw over a grand into cardboard. Fortunately I made the deck before everything became expensive (back when I only paid maybe 200-300 for it) and the majority of my magic cards have paid for themselves through winning and investing
Yep, i can see why your decks win! and with the combos they would be fun to play!....They are not my style though....a bit too....T1, you know...a deck that literally has a well known NAME for how its built always seems to take the shine off it, you know? Even though you were one of the first people to make it if it was only £200 when you bought it!Should i make this entirely devoted to the pllipalla pop combo then?...it just seems a bit fragile to reply solely on that... I added muddle the mixture for tutor...
I would say ur next step it to better focus the deck and look for your best options for cards. like I would play wall of blossoms and sylvan caryatid, plus ull need counter spells like remand and removal like beast within