Counter and Destroy

by Pedro1470 on 11 April 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Can reverse damage as well as counter (just built and still trying it out)

Deck Tags

  • Other...

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 735 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0260190

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Counter and Destroy

Unless youre trying to run a Highlander deck, Please look at the advice at my next comment.

0
Posted 12 April 2009 at 18:57

Permalink

I see that you are getting a good grasp of a counter/burn deck. but, classic counter/burn, you shouldnt have that many creatures. I would ditch the Countryside Crusher, Drake Familiar, Coral Eel, Whimwader, Fencer Clique, Ordruun Commando, War-Spike Changeling, Needlepeak Spider, Jaya Ballard, Task Mage, Creature Bond, and Reality Twist. Add more Wee Dragonauts, Vulshock Berserkers, Gelectrodes, some Steamcore Weirds, some Disruptive Pitmages, and a Tibor and Lumia.
and you will want to lose the Snow-Covered Mountain, about 2-3 Mountains, and 2-3 Islands.

Toss out the Frazzle, cuz you have to face an opponent who uses blue.
Replace the Convolute with Counterspell.
Add some Mana Leaks, Shocks, Incinerates, more Lava Axe, more Volcanic Hammer, more Blaze, and maybe even a couple of Put Away.

0
Posted 12 April 2009 at 18:57

Permalink

i agree with the comment up there, too much relying on creatures and doing attacking damage, your spreading the effect of your deck out too much

comment on my deck what do you think? http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=79144

0
Posted 26 July 2010 at 22:01

Permalink