Clone Shell...Bitch*

by PhantomMarth on 10 February 2014

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 789 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

13012414

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Clone Shell...Bitch*

What is this deck supposed to do?

1
Posted 10 February 2014 at 09:25

Permalink

ok ok turn 3 clone shell (avacyn's pilgrim, farseek)
-bounce the shell, with cloudshift and resto angel to exile more cards with clone shell-
once you have enough creatures (urabrask the hidden, and others) you can doom blade your own clone shell.
*Avacyn makes creatures indestructible and Urabrask makes creatures have haste...also if you hit a Craterhoof thats alot of damage around turn 5 or 6.

This deck is not consistent but fun as hell to crack open when you have a bunch of creatures in the c. shell...The imprint works multiple times because ive played in tournaments with it and judges have been called for rulings...
unless something is different now a days xD

0
Posted 10 February 2014 at 19:40

Permalink

Uhh, that's not quite how it works. Everytime it re - enters the battlefield it is a new creature, so it has no connection to the card previously exiled.

0
Posted 10 February 2014 at 23:28

Permalink

Ha that was the reason a judge was called buuuuuuut the judge gave me another ruling which stuck, like I said it might be different now but it did work xD

-The wording, imprint A card and when it leave return THE card; if there are more then one card the return process happens in separate triggers. Some judges might disagree but because of the wording along with the minimal amount of people trying this it never needed to be addressed xD

0
Posted 14 February 2014 at 02:46

Permalink

interesting, I have heard similar things about cipher.

0
Posted 14 February 2014 at 02:53

Permalink