1st Turn Kill Atog

by planestalker on 30 November 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Again here's shout out to Shifting Shapes who had the orginal idea for deck using Grapeshot for the kill. Check it out at http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=65185 and let the world know you like it.

How to play

1. Mulligan till you have Glimpse of Nature and a Elvish Spirit Guide.
2. Cast Glimpse of Nature and then cast and draw a bunch of creatures until you have both Atog and Reckless Charge in hand and hopefully and 1RR mana availible thru Lotus Petal and Spirit Guides.
3. Cast Atog then Reckless Charge and Mob Mentality then have Atog Gobble a bunch of artifact creatures and attack for win. Hopefully Street Wraith's will help you draw over any bumps in the road.

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

18
Likes

This deck has been viewed 31,957 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

00878

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for 1st Turn Kill Atog

not so bad in theory.... but i gotta say taking mulligans to get those 2 cards would be difficult and ultimately fatal in a match against a fast opponent.

2
Posted 30 November 2010 at 01:23

Permalink

I think you meant Reckless Charge, not Reckless Abandon.

Maybe use Memnite instead of Shifting Wall or Phyrexian Marauder so that Atog has more stuff to sacrifice, just in case.

1
Posted 30 November 2010 at 02:12

Permalink

superwill21.

You of course are correct. Don't know why I imported Reckless Abandon. I will fix deck list.

0
Posted 30 November 2010 at 09:51

Permalink

Ain't possible. Lotus Petal is restricted.

1
Posted 01 December 2010 at 17:45

Permalink

Can't let that stop you. If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying!

3
Posted 02 December 2010 at 02:35

Permalink

Icetforu,

MTG Card search says its legal in Legacy and Classic, but restricted in Vintage.

http://magiccards.info/query?q=Lotus+Petal&v=card&s=cname

Restricted in Vintage (Type 1)
Legal in Legacy (Type 1.5)
Legal in Classic (MTGO)

0
Posted 02 December 2010 at 13:54

Permalink

Can someone explain to me how this is better than charbelcher :)

2
Posted 06 January 2011 at 20:57

Permalink

Nice idea, but there's a card I like to use against this type of deck - Holy Day (or any of the equivalents {Fog, Ethereal Haze, Darkness, etc}) :p

2
Posted 18 March 2011 at 09:28

Permalink

Yup. This is a very fragile deck. I just take it out for the fun of casting 50 creatures in one turn

0
Posted 18 March 2011 at 14:39

Permalink

I have a deck built around grapeshot as well... Even though this one isnt

Plz take look at it and tell me what you think
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=161121

1
Posted 19 March 2011 at 11:39

Permalink

could you check out my attempt at a turn one win as well? http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=200235

1
Posted 25 June 2011 at 23:21

Permalink

Took a look and left a few comments.

0
Posted 01 July 2011 at 17:59

Permalink

you could put in some Serum Powders in to get over the mulligan problems, but its gunna take out a lot of cards in your deck. good fun with atog though :) always loved that card

1
Posted 26 June 2011 at 03:03

Permalink

deathtyrant5000 has deleted this comment.

Posted 26 June 2011 at 03:17

Permalink

Conceptually, it's okay. But i'd wreck it with my burn/counter deck. you wouldn't get your desired hand immediately and also, atog would meet it's demise before it resolved.

1
Posted 27 June 2011 at 03:29

Permalink

congratulations for saying a certain type of deck is weak to a certain type of deck, you just covered 100% of all decks ever.

1
Posted 30 June 2011 at 09:29

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=202404

1
Posted 29 June 2011 at 05:12

Permalink

Hi jarretbeast97,

Took a look at your tendrils/ad nauseum deck. Most of the comments already there were saying what I would of suggested and turned it into more like the orginal tourney winning ANT deck. So instead of commenting on your deck let me just suggest that when borrowing an deck idea from someone for a deck it would nice if you give credit.

0
Posted 14 April 2012 at 00:41

Permalink