Goliaths Disarm Their Davids

by RoughneckBarbarian on 28 October 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Light of Sanction and/or Mark of Asylum protects my creatures while I clear the board with spells and abilities that deal damage to all creatures, and it's really not viable in 1v1 format. This deck wins at least 80% of the time, and it is EASILY my favorite (I actually have a theme song for this one that I listen to while I play it).

This is the deck as it stands today in its as-nearly-finished-as-possible form. If there are any cards from the Alara set forward that need to be in this deck, let me know.

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 728 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

900490

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Goliaths Disarm Their Davids

Good job, but I'm not sure how high is the chance of getting Bloodfire Colossus (or the Harbinger) and a protecting enchantment. I'd probably use 4 Harbingers, Colossuses Light of Sanctions and Mark of Asylums.
By the way, I've read this deck right after finishing my Giant deck!

0
Posted 29 October 2009 at 02:17

Permalink

The chances aren't very high. That's why I have Thundercloud Shaman, Hammerfist Giant, Pyrohemia, and Kindle the Carnage to deal damage. Light of Sanction and Mark of Asylum are redundant because they serve the same purpose. It's basically like having 6 of the same card in the deck.

0
Posted 29 October 2009 at 07:03

Permalink

hmm mana ramp ocould be really helpfull in here

bbut i can't see what kind of mana accelerators exist in W or R

0
Posted 24 November 2009 at 11:45

Permalink

Not very many is the answer.

0
Posted 24 November 2009 at 14:14

Permalink