Millstraction

by SavageTheCabbage on 16 September 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Redesigning my Milltraction with a little more aggro. Experimental build with more than just a mill win-con.

Deck Tags

  • Mill

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,712 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0123900

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Millstraction

I'm not that great with blue (it's my worst colour), so I can't suggest much. I can say, however, that I (personally) don't like seeing so many 1x and 2x in a deck. I know some cards are restricted in Vintage, but I still don't like seeing that (my group plays Legacy or Standard, so no restrictions, just banning). I do like Sunken Ruins for mana fixing (wish I had a set). Not much else I can say, I do like the idea of having a secondary win condition :p

0
Posted 16 September 2011 at 21:47

Permalink

I typically don't like to run so many 1-of / 2-of either, except for lands. I make a few exceptions now and then, though :) Bitter Ordeal, for example, is there to be a tutored bomb after detonating Neviny's. I do also have this propensity towards building toolbox decks, and that is made even more apparent when I'm running tutors.. I may refine this down a bit still, but cards like Thoughtseize, being the only discard spell, could go to fit something more potent with mill. But I included it because mill itself doesn't control whats in an opponents hand already. That, and opening with a Thoughtseize has won me games by itself in the past.. a lot of the cards in here are like that, carefully considered for their utilitarian roles within this deck (or at least, I tried to :P).

Sunken Ruins is a good idea, over Drowned Catacombs, and maybe a Darkslick Shore. I get kind of lazy when it comes time to put together my land base, which is bad because it is the most important part of a deck XD

0
Posted 18 September 2011 at 16:26

Permalink

I get what you mean, I was mostly pointing out personal problems with the deck due to personal preferences.

Sunken Ruins (and all the others like it) are my favourite dual lands (though I only have 4 of each of the BW, RG and 2 of the GW). I think they are way too often overlooked and I've been trying to trade for the others my group has :p

0
Posted 18 September 2011 at 19:53

Permalink

The Alpha-Unlimited dual lands are my favorite :P All of the benefits, none of the drawbacks.. I swear I'm going to have to invest like.. $2,000 one day (when I'm rich) to get a full play set >.> Second to those are the Ravnica shock lands, but that's only because they also have a basic land type and are therefore very flexible with fetches.

The only problem I have with the Shadowmoor dual lands is that they require a colored mana already to produce more. I prefer lands that can produce the color I need with no other stipulation, except perhaps paying life or etb tapped.

0
Posted 18 September 2011 at 20:39

Permalink

I understand your concern with the Shadowmoor duals, but I've only ever used the ones I have in two colour decks (normally as my only non basic) and I've almost always had at least 1 of the two colour's needed to activate the land's mana filter :p

0
Posted 19 September 2011 at 15:38

Permalink