Knights who say "CAW!"

by scorpio7777 on 03 March 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Sorceries (1)


Instants (7)


Artifacts (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Yes... I went there. I combined the Caw-Blade with White Knights.

Hoping one of my builds works well enough to be tournament worthy.

I have a U/W build as well: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=156070

Which one I should focus on? Leave some feedback =)

Deck Tags

  • Tournament

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,041 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

3611030

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Knights who say "CAW!"

Need to slim it down to 60 cards. Suggestions !?

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:40

Permalink

Get rid of Spell Pierce and Bonehoard.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 14:59

Permalink

Ok, Spell Pierce and Bonehoard out! Any other ideas?

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 15:23

Permalink

id say take out the clone

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 16:11

Permalink

Lol you took my favorite deck and mutated it with pro tour cheap ness :)

looks good, hows the mana for this one? more jaces?

here is my knight deck, untested against caw-blade, but tested and good again u/w without caw tech.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=145430

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 11:58

Permalink

I like it quite a bit. Very well designed overall - I was extra impressed with the land base. I'd probably cut the Clone for whichever creature seems most needed as an extra. My guess is on the Mystic or Crusador. Instead of DoJ, I would probably want just some spot removal because you are basically a creature deck and wrathing your own team seems like a bad idea (I wouldn't bank on always having 2 Exemplars out). I guess I could see it being decent in the sideboard but probably not maindeck so much.

0
Posted 06 March 2011 at 22:04

Permalink

I also forgot to mention that my favorite part of the deck, and almost the biggest reason I want to try it, is the title! I love it! Well done. The deck could be terrible and I'd still want to try it just to say I played with some Knights who said "Caw!" :) In fact, I may have to make a weird version of this to do just that. haha.

0
Posted 06 March 2011 at 22:07

Permalink

Thank you! =) So far, testing is very good with this deck. The only decks that really give it a huge issue is the Mirror and red deck wins. It does quite well against most others, especially after sideboard.

It is surprising, but it's not very often that I get a major manascrew either.

Overall, I'd probably rate this deck 8/10. It's not QUITE tourney worthy, but still very good and fun to play.

0
Posted 08 March 2011 at 11:04

Permalink

Well that's good to hear, though! I mean, quite honestly neither of those 2 decks that it has trouble with are tearing it up in standard tournaments for the most part. However, to fight RDW, Perimeter Captain and especially Kor Firewalker are excellent at basically winning against RDW. Perimeter Captain lands a turn earlier and seems like it is probably easier to cast and maybe better against Kuldotha Red but the Firewalker is best against true RDW, possibly even Kuldotha. Plus it can attack back!

0
Posted 08 March 2011 at 16:15

Permalink