Fire Bad!

by Sirus on 19 September 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

The goal is to deal as much damage as possible in the fewest amount of turns you can while avoiding all defenses. Sacrifice your goblins to deal damage. Most cards have a low mana cost which helps the speed of damage output by quite a bit.

Also, one main goal of this deck was to make it DIRT CHEAP! This deck cost me about $10, most of which was due to Valakut. $10 is nothing when you see how much winning you'll be doing with this deck.

I've had many many turn 3, 4 and 5 wins with this deck.

Things like using Goblin Grenade on Goblin Arsonist, then using Brimstone Volley's Morbid ability and doing 11 damage in one turn with only 4 mana really pisses people off, especially when you draw a Thunderous Wrath then next turn and kill them off for 1 mana.

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

3
Likes

This deck has been viewed 963 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000440

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Fire Bad!

Banefire..
Looks Good, check this deck out if you have a moment !
Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386341

0
Posted 19 September 2012 at 13:17

Permalink

I like that card but it doesn't fit this deck at all. All of the cards in this deck require low mana costs which is the whole point. Most of the time I win games with only 3 or 4 mana on the field, so at most that card would deal like 3 or 4 damage. And when I have multiple cards that can deal 5 damage for 1 mana that card seems a little weak.

0
Posted 19 September 2012 at 16:50

Permalink

If that is the case and you usually don't have more than 4 lands in play I suggest the Valakut land for Teetering Peaks

0
Posted 26 September 2012 at 01:07

Permalink

Why even bother making that suggestion? Once again, that does not fit in this deck at all. You must be horrible at making decks.

0
Posted 30 September 2012 at 08:41

Permalink

@Sirus, teetering peaks is great in globin decks +2/+2 for free+a land?? cmon???. You don't have a reliable way to stock up the 5 mountains to activate the Valakut so I believe my suggestion is good. Also if you have a doubt about my deck building skills you are welcome to follow me and view my front page decks :)

0
Posted 05 October 2012 at 03:47

Permalink

I guess I should add that the Valakuts are no longer in this deck, but have been to lazy too change this page. The main reason is because it comes out tapped and I never have 5 lands out.
And you seem to be missing the point of this deck. There is almost no actual attacking in this deck. The goblins are only there to be sacrificed, block, and ping (Fireslinger). Buffing them would not help this deck at all.
Also, in the next week or two I'm changing this deck into a Standard Goblin/token deck so none of this matters anyways.

0
Posted 08 October 2012 at 18:45

Permalink

Goblin Guide, but if you want to make it cheap, not to much i could suggest. I would take out Chandra and only one Thunderous Wrath, slow, and add Sulfuric Vortex, is incredible great and is constant damage and life decks would not be a problem to your speed burn anymore. Please comment my deck if have time, http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386525

0
Posted 19 September 2012 at 17:03

Permalink