Splooge

525 Decks, 389 Comments, 90 Reputation

Exactly. It's just too good to pass up in this list.

0
Posted 19 January 2015 at 22:28 in reply to #530041 on Junk Modern

Permalink

There is a lack of Siege Rhino in this deck list :L

2
Posted 19 January 2015 at 22:18 as a comment on Junk Modern

Permalink

I meant to put titans strength in the sideboard. My b D:

0
Posted 11 January 2015 at 14:27 in reply to #528460 on R/W Heroic

Permalink

Just gotta say that Possum is aggressive, jeez. Calm down guys. Budget decks are fun and can potentially net wins. Thats all we needed to know, so no more arguing or you're going to time out guys!

1
Posted 09 January 2015 at 06:25 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Thanks :)

0
Posted 08 January 2015 at 17:08 in reply to #527904 on [Budget] Burn Baby Burn.

Permalink

They aren't budget. This is clearly a budget build.

0
Posted 08 January 2015 at 01:04 in reply to #527800 on [Budget] Burn Baby Burn.

Permalink

They shouldn't be limited to a kitchen table. It's a called "not having money but still want to play in some fnm tournaments." You can play budget burn and expect to win a few games, I'm not saying all I'm just saying a few.

1
Posted 08 January 2015 at 00:54 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

I mean for budget you have monastery swiftspears as your goblin guides instead, you run hellspark elementals, spark elementals and Keldon Marauders make up the creature lineup. And the rest is just burn spells that are cheap and effective. Here's a budget list that can win turn 3.

http://www.mtgvault.com/splooge/decks/budget-burn-baby-burn/

0
Posted 07 January 2015 at 04:19 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

You don't even need noble heirarch. And RDW is still budget, it's a burn deck so you can use crappier spells or creatures if necessary. You can still win some good games with a bad burn deck :p

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 23:16 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

True and true. I just like the magic 1 of that's all. And just run Mono Green Infect or RDW for the most budget decks in modern rn.

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 22:59 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Better than 55 for Tarns .-.

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 22:53 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Well if you don't want to run scalding tarns for splash of blue, you can definitely run wooded foothills now! They are really cheap at $11 dollars each :)

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 22:46 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

well I'd like it to stay at one as a goodie card. It's not overused, just there for a goodie feeling. I would normally do 2 but this is got more heavy white than a normal boros burn deck. SOWWY.

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 19:43 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Okay, compromise. I'll add more fetches so I can splash blue for a treasure cruise.

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 04:50 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Correct. But it's not necessary. Honestly the deck thinning is so minuscule that it barely raises the chances of drawing a nonland card. I'd rather have that 1 life over thinning one mountain.

-1
Posted 06 January 2015 at 04:40 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Well you can get that but only 4 is needed.

0
Posted 03 January 2015 at 02:50 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

0
Posted 02 January 2015 at 19:54 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Well if you are the burn deck you don't think about it too much. If it dies it dies. You keep throwing spells out there. Cause if they used the mana to kill it, they didn't leave enough open to counter you hand full of burn.

1
Posted 02 January 2015 at 04:56 in reply to #526468 on White Flame

Permalink

Why? It's not like this is the grim lavamancer build.

0
Posted 02 January 2015 at 04:56 in reply to #526463 on White Flame

Permalink

Thanks mate! :)

0
Posted 01 January 2015 at 02:52 in reply to #526326 on White Flame

Permalink

61-80 of 389 items