Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Legacy Lots of Lands deck with my budgety tweaking sideboard not complete (abandoned is not actually in there)
This deck has been viewed 9,878 times.
Azusa, Lost but Seeking would be fun. i don't exactly see how this deck would win..... i think Rude Awakening might fix that problem. also, treetop vilage may help with early damage and killing white Weenies. hope i helped.
Permalink
i dont get it.....
dagbaker has deleted this comment.
u guys are stupid. fuckin landfall is gay as hell and nobody plays it in legacy. this is a fuckin budget version of a tier 1 deck, so u people who barely understand standard can fuck off. sorry im in a bad mood today, but damn noobs. except for brian bell. he knows what he is talking about.
so you looked at it? anyway this deck needs a better win condition than deck out.. and there really is no point in the valakut's with 8 mountains, the most damage you could get is 12 which is highly unlikely even with the search cards and life from the loam; also i am no noob... been playing since scourge
uh... no... i can get fucken infinite by sacking it over and over again and bringing it back. you should look more at popular legacy decks dude. this is a famous deck, with, as i said, budget tweaking. sorry if i made u mad, but, cmon, dont just throw your "mine is better than yours" shit out there if u dont even noe the deck.
there are ONLY four cards that bring them back is all im saying
crucible of worlds is good for this, more chance of getting the three mountains back but seriously the mountain count should be at least ten, especially with it being your only win condition
ok. gamble gets the life from the loam. so does mulch (sort of). you can bring it back from the grave infinite times, so it works fine. crucible is good in this deck, and quite a few people play it, but i don't like it. if u try playing with the deck getting the mountains is not much of a problem, but ill raise it by one just for u. forests are very crucial to the deck, and i didn't want to lower my chances of getting one, but u could be right.
yeah i realised you also needed forest for it, i also forgot what dredge was till i read this comment hehe. now, i realised that the glacial chasm has cumulative upkeep, so i think they could really hurt you after a few turns(and i know you have the zuran orb). i'm starting to understand how this works A LOT more by disecting it. i think we got off on the wront foot.
i agree sorry bout being mean. the thing about the chasm though, is that it is an infinite combo. with zuran orb, you never take a thing, and without, you can always sac it instead of paying, then get it back with life from the loam. the non budget version uses alot more better cards tho. tabernacle, maze of ith, and most importantly the radishan port and wasteland. with those, you manaskrew them in the begining, then when they get stuff you chasm and maze of ith them. eventually u win unless they are combo or pull something off. either with man lands or damage lands are normally how u win (or worm harvest), this deck was cultivating valakut. it is also budget, so i didnt add the other crazy cards.
Aaboy66 has deleted this comment.
Holy shit man, congrats on 100! Damn, and I thought 20 was a lot!
you should see dknight27. over 300 decks by the hommie
Im sorry if Im stupid, but I dont see how you win? Do you win by making the opponent have no cards left in library and just heal yourself/make yourself invurnable to the opponent?
Read every card in the deck... Valakut is the win con.
Hate to break it to you, but you can't have 14 Abandoned Outposts in a deck. Only Basic Lands can defy the 4-copy rule. Congratulations on 100 decks, though.
Hey man, this is a really old deck. If you read the description, you'd know why there are 14 Abandoned Outposts there. Lmao.
thats not true Relentless Rats also can
Good point, didn't see that in the description.
how do you win with this deck? put some knight of the reliquary and soul's fire, you can really win with those cards!!!!
In most XX-Lands decks my win condition is you scooping pretty much... If it's a judge asking you always say 'manlands, and decking them out', because most lists are more about not losing than anything.
ale96 has deleted this comment.
mhh..... in how many turns you can win? yes it's a really nice deck but if you play with a deck wich gain very much life you can't win =| .......... anyway i don't like this deck...................
To be fair to the deck it's VERY much a budget build, seeing as the average lands deck has another zero at the end of the tag... But admittedly this list is objectively shoddy.
You need to learn how to take criticism, buddy.
WhitePlama has deleted this comment.
Haha. I Memoricide your Life from the Loam Xp.
Majician has deleted this comment.
I completely understand the deck and your win-con, but by making it budgeted, it's become extremely weak. You seriously need Crucible of Worlds in here. Come on, at least one. Why the hell wouldn't you like it? I know they're expensive, but adding one or two would still keep it budget and would make it MUCH better. I'm not trying to be a dick or anything, but in my experience Valakut decks often suck pretty hard unless you dump a bunch of money into them. I would try and have one other win-con in here in case Valakut doesn't pan out. I have to ask, how many times have you randomly discarded the card that you Gambled for? Unless you're cheating, I'm sure it has happened quite a bit. It just doesn't seem consistent enough. I don't mean to be negative - this deck isn't really bad by any means - it's just that the "budget" aspect shows, ya know?
Normally you gamble for Life from the Loam, so it doesn't matter as much if you discard it. I haven't played the deck, but looking at it that was obvious.
Shit, I forgot Life from the Loam had Dredge. Silly me! The rest of my comment still stands!
I forgot what dredge was originally, which is what you'll see in the first few comments.
darigaaz20 has deleted this comment.
clearly just a valakut deck with land recursion. I like it :D I tried to make one a couple of weeks ago but Life from the Loam is pretty expensive. GW.
i understand you are trying to get land... but there is not perpose for the lands you should find a perpose like eldrazi, alot of low/semilow hexproofs, planeswalkers anything...
the purpose of the lands is to deal a bunch of damage with Valakut..
but I agree that there should be an alternate win condition, such as a powerful planeswalker/Eldrazi perhaps
An alternate win-con would definitely be required sideboard tech. While Glacial Chasm protects you from damage, you're pretty screwed if anyone stops you from casting your recursion spells or exiles your graveyard/hand/anything. I guess I would have to see it played, but it really doesn't seem as reliable as it could be. :/