The Worst Deck Ever Made

by weberwithoneb on 17 November 2013

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (4 cards)

Creatures (2)

Instants (1)


Artifacts (1)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


How to Play

F!@#, you figure it out.

Deck Tags

  • Bad
  • Terrible
  • Horrible
  • Casual

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

10
Likes

This deck has been viewed 2,987 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

12416280

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for The Worst Deck Ever Made

One thing. Where is Razor Boomerang :D

2
Posted 17 November 2013 at 17:19

Permalink

Sideboarded ;)

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:50

Permalink

i......... dont get it.

1
Posted 17 November 2013 at 18:22

Permalink

They took the worst rated cards ever and put them in a deck that literally couldn't operate because there is almost no land. And that is about all there is to it.

2
Posted 17 November 2013 at 18:48

Permalink

*eye twitches*

4
Posted 18 November 2013 at 02:36

Permalink

It's not complete without North Star.

0
Posted 17 November 2013 at 21:21

Permalink

I don't know, I'm seeing some small amount of love on <a href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Discussion.aspx?multiverseid=1415">North Star's Gatherer Discussion page</a>. It sucks, but is it *the worst*?

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:53

Permalink

If you are making a deck of the WORST CARDS EVER, then you are missing:
Angel's Feather
Demon's Horn
Kraken's Eye
Dragon's Claw
Basilisk's Tooth

'Cos let's face it. They're shit cards

2
Posted 17 November 2013 at 22:06

Permalink

They are, but Wizard's prints those shit cards that like those, and the Staff of the Magus' every year. If you added them all, it's be out right too much to handle.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 00:32

Permalink

The Staff of the Magus or whatever they're called are better than the cards I mentioned
The staffs can be OK for beginners, until they learn how to make a deck, but the other things are just terrible
Yeah, Wizards ALWAYS reprint those cards but I don't know of anything worse

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 00:58

Permalink

Those could qualify for yet another shitty deck, but I'm not sure if they are <em>the worst</em>.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:55

Permalink

Clue stones

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 04:09

Permalink

True, but there are worse things out there

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 04:13

Permalink

agreed .... drown in filth

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 22:11

Permalink

Have you ever played Golgari?
They're ALL ABOUT the graveyard. If you want a standard reanimate, you play Golgari!

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 22:22

Permalink

ok , i'll reconsider the card

0
Posted 20 November 2013 at 00:09

Permalink

Scornful Egotist isn't that bad. Scourge had a few cards that dealt with the highest CMC card you you get X. You could put that out for pretty cheap and use it to your advantage.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 00:29

Permalink

8 mana 1/1 with morph
yeah, real great

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 00:59

Permalink

You're missing the point. It's a card that costs 3 to play, with a CMC of 8. There's cool synergies you can play with there. It's not the best card ever printed, but it's a card that a smart player can pull cool combos with. Think about Rush of Knowledge, or Dispersal Shield in the context of this guy.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 01:24

Permalink

Mayve I'm just ignorant because I don't play Vintage/Legacy, but were you see a combo, I see a perfectly good waste of mana and deckspace

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 01:31

Permalink

The game isn't always about making the perfect deck. Sometimes it's about doing something awesome.

There was a cool article somebody from Wizards wrote ages back, where they said they made cards like Scornful Egoist and Goblin Test Pilot to see what cool combos players would come up with. It's a "this card's got an average costing cost but a HUGE CMC, now go you beautiful lunatics, and do something with it," sorta deal.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 01:36

Permalink

Goblin test pilot is 3 mana and not bad
Scornful Egotist has a CMC of 6 for his ego alone

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 01:42

Permalink

How are you getting 6 for a CMC?
Thanks for StrategicMuffinExhausted for mentioning the cards I was talking about.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 03:57

Permalink

Simple, Scornful Egotist is an 8 mana 1/1 with morph
I'd think that a card like that would only cost 2 mana, not 8

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:09

Permalink

He has no ability, his strength is his CMC and the ability to get to the battlefield for half the cost.

1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:13

Permalink

Guys it's best not to talk abou- ALL HAIL THE GREAT LORD EGOTIST

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 21:36

Permalink

Wrong, wrong amd even MORE wrong
Here is Scornful Egotist:

Card Information
Creature-Wizard 1/1, 7U
Card Rules
Morph {U} (You may play this face down as a 2/2 creature for {3}. Turn it face up any time for its morph cost.)

Taked DIRECTLY from the card information/link.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 21:59

Permalink

Bro I don't know how you're missing this.

"Morph {U} (You may play this face down as a 2/2 creature for {3}. Turn it face up any time for its morph cost.)"

" play this face down as a 2/2 creature for {3}."

" play this ... 2/2 ... {3}."

"PLAY THIS ... {3}."

I really don't know how I can make it any more clear. It costs {3} to cost, the morph cost is {U}. The CMC is 8, but if you're casting it for its full cost, you're doing something wrong.

2
Posted 19 November 2013 at 04:08

Permalink

Where's Chimney Imp?!

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 02:23

Permalink

It's not all that bad.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 02:25

Permalink

Yeah sorry Snake, doesn't qualify.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:56

Permalink

You've forced me to do this- Pale Moon. You can tap for COLORLESS mana. Rare quality.

(Only with non-basic lands though)

And if that doesn't tickle your fancy then look at One With Nothing.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 19:06

Permalink

Pale moon is actually a fantastic control card. If you know that your opponent is running a lot of non basic lands, then it makes most of them pretty much useless. Which prevents them from casting spells, for lack of the right colored mana.

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 08:53

Permalink

what happened to zombie goliath... the classic terrible card.

1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:25

Permalink

Classic. Sideboarded.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:57

Permalink

So I see a lot of sub-par cards, but not the worst in the game. No camel?, or leeches? Or perhaps ruinous minotaur?

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:31

Permalink

I don't know dude, apparently people like <a href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=189624">Ruinous Minotaur</a>. It combos with <a href="http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Countryside%20Crusher">Countryside Crusher</a>.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 07:59

Permalink

It seems like a pretty sketchy combo. But it does make the card usable I guess. Personally I still don't think it is worth sacrificing a bunch of lands for it. Perhaps if you built a whole deck around that concept, to lessen the negative impact it has on you... It could be interesting I guess. Although I do have to note that my suggestions are bad as individual cards. Some of the cards on this list are very useful if put into the right deck. :)

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 10:58

Permalink

Don't forget to add Groundskeeper/Crucible of Worlds in there. The combo makes much more sense when you add them into the equation.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 15:13

Permalink

Yes, I understand how to build around it, but it just seems like a lot of work for very little payoff is all. That is what I mean by sketchy. It works, but it is almost too slow to be competitive. Sure it is fun in casual though.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 22:37

Permalink

It's missing chimney imp :p

1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:45

Permalink

are you kidding me? chimney imp is amazing!

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:47

Permalink

Oh right, sorry I thought this was the BEST deck ever made. I was wondering why it was also missing storm crow then

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:50

Permalink

STORM CROW for the WIN!!!!!!!!

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:51

Permalink

storm crow isnt actually that bad

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 04:58

Permalink

Yeah, it is just vanilla is all. A 1/2 flyer for cheap.

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 06:01

Permalink

you forgot vizzerdrix!

0
Posted 18 November 2013 at 08:35

Permalink

VIZZERDRIX IS THE BEST CARD EVER PRINTED. YOU WATCH YOUR MOUTH.


lol.....

1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 21:23

Permalink

I've seen better

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 21:26

Permalink

oh, i have the most amazing combo for this deck: zombie goliath, enchanted with primal visitation! a 7/6 haste for 10 mana! wow!

2
Posted 18 November 2013 at 09:00

Permalink

This deck makes me laugh! XD Nicely done!

1
Posted 18 November 2013 at 15:53

Permalink

Thanks Soltur. ;)

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 11:56

Permalink

No problem. I dare someone to run this deck! XDD

What about Fleshmad Steed?

0
Posted 20 November 2013 at 16:01

Permalink

mudhole?


1
Posted 19 November 2013 at 00:55

Permalink

I guess when running a mill deck, Mudhole could protect against Elixir of Immortality? It's red though, and who has a red mill deck? Sideboarded.

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 11:59

Permalink

HAHA mudhole...where will YOU be when diarrhea hits lol

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 17:26

Permalink

I had a red mill deck:
Burn with Mindcrank. Funny shit, but not very good

1
Posted 19 November 2013 at 21:27

Permalink

haha nice!

0
Posted 20 November 2013 at 02:23

Permalink

Razortip Whip lol...*shudders*

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 01:00

Permalink

why was it ever an uncommon? i thought wizzards would have learnt by then.

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 01:03

Permalink

Rod of Ruin and Telim'Tor's Darts are probably worse!

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 12:02

Permalink

It's not THAT bad, helped me quite a bit at the pre-release

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 15:45

Permalink

Razor boomerang is way worse than all of them.

0
Posted 19 November 2013 at 22:35

Permalink

TURE, TURE, TRUE

0
Posted 20 November 2013 at 18:01

Permalink

idk i think rod of ruin is turrible. 7 initial mana to do 1 damage and 3 every other time.

0
Posted 22 November 2013 at 23:18

Permalink

Yes,but it is cheaper than the boomerang in the long run,and easier to use too. It is 7 for the initial damage, but only 3 for each damage after. The boomerang is 5 each time, AND you have to have a creature out.

0
Posted 23 November 2013 at 01:07

Permalink

yeah, it is the WORST DECK EVER MADE!!!!
GOOD JOB MAN.

1
Posted 20 November 2013 at 18:00

Permalink

Thanks dude :D

0
Posted 20 November 2013 at 20:26

Permalink

Funny, I had an idea where my friend should also make a terrible (but playable) deck and we can see who can win with the worst deck.

1
Posted 20 November 2013 at 18:34

Permalink

Aladin's ring ! Please look at my knight deck and leave comments. :)

0
Posted 21 January 2014 at 23:15

Permalink

@julian123 I can't see your knight deck! Is it listed?

0
Posted 21 January 2014 at 23:33

Permalink

Yes, I don't know why you can't see it. :)

0
Posted 12 April 2014 at 19:39

Permalink

I want to see this up against Not-so-budget deck (http://www.mtgvault.com/adamantian/decks/not-so-budget-deck/), see who wins. :D

1
Posted 22 January 2014 at 01:38

Permalink

MAINBOARD Razor Boomerang!!

0
Posted 12 April 2014 at 18:32

Permalink

Agreed. Razorwhip is much better that that
Isn't it like 5 mama for 1 damage including equiping costs?

0
Posted 12 April 2014 at 22:41

Permalink

Crazed goblin? Far from good but far from the worst too..... They can be useful with boggart shenanigans.... Plus it's a one drop, one mountain isn't that big of a waste.

0
Posted 12 April 2014 at 23:25

Permalink