Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Not entirely sure how I feel about playing five walkers, but I'll try it for now I guess. No, I'm not one of those crazies who runs seven in LandStill usually, I'm one of the crazies who runs four copies of Snapcaster usually.
This deck has been viewed 1,177 times.
I've never seen the reason to run seven either...it just seems silly to me. I see why you'd like to use four snappys in this build, as the spell suite is so damn good, and really gains from reusability. I like this man. Seven is silly, but five seems like it would work well =]
Permalink
The only reason I can give for somebody running seven is they just ran out of ideas, or they're entirely dependent on their walkers. I like being in neither camp.Honestly, when it gets right down to it, the only walkers I really like at three are Liliana of the Veil, Innistrad Sorin, and either of the versions of Tezzeret. Jace only gets a pass to three in this deck because of how absolutely insane he is within the shell.And yeah, the suite is too good not to want the playset. This is probably the only deck I've made outside of Vintage that can do 1{U}{U}{U} reliably, and that has been giving me some ideas since I made this. I've been brewing a RUG list about in my head, and I think it's time to try my hand at making it a reality.