Super Soldiery

by Zaplight on 03 September 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Soldier-weenie deck, with lots a' boosts

Point of deck is to swarm boosted creatures
All suggestions welcome!

Deck Tags

  • Weenie

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,036 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

520040

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Super Soldiery

Not really sure why you wouldn't have Honor of the Pure in place of your Glorious Anthems... Or Oblivion rings instead of Disenchant.... Or why you wouldn't be running any elite vanguards... But it looks solid. :)

0
Posted 03 September 2009 at 18:59

Permalink

Check out my goblin deck if you would too :)

0
Posted 03 September 2009 at 19:00

Permalink

Oblivion rings and Disenchant are for totally different things. Oblivion Rings just gets something away temporarily, while Disenchant is a very specific Destroy effect. It's in there as an anti-artifact/anti-enchantment card, because there aren't any others in the deck.

And while Elite Vanguard is an awesome card, I like the recruit's first strike, which makes them much more dangerous that the vanguard when beefed up

0
Posted 03 September 2009 at 19:38

Permalink

ummm i know its not a cheap to play card but captain of the watch. i dont see why not. love that card

0
Posted 03 September 2009 at 22:38

Permalink

I would but a: it's expensive (but it's okay to have SOME big cards) but more importantly b: what would I take out?? Everything's either a decent-price booster or a cheap early-game/ swarm card that I need.

0
Posted 04 September 2009 at 00:03

Permalink