ancient10k

25 Decks, 32 Comments, 0 Reputation

i did but in this case with Thalia on it cost more so i tried to keep the non-creature spells at a minimum

0
Posted 05 February 2012 at 01:47 in reply to #232261 on UW Humans

Permalink

You were saying vault skirge has infect or i missunderstood? Because he has Lifelink not Infect, i thought you were refering to the inkmoth when you said infect.

0
Posted 23 December 2011 at 05:02 in reply to #222853 on Puresteel-Mentor Control

Permalink

Thanks!!!, Mulch is great!

0
Posted 19 December 2011 at 04:29 in reply to #222241 on Innistrad Bock UG Skaab

Permalink

Updated the list to be more controllish

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 05:16 as a comment on Puresteel-Mentor Control

Permalink

Memnite or Ornithopters are not lands so i would have to make room for them making. The Inkmoth is not there to be offensive(because metalcraft is the key here), but in the late game it can be an alternative win condition because i can pump it with a sword or an flayer husk (beacause the are free with a puresteel).

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 05:15 in reply to #220500 on Puresteel-Mentor Control

Permalink

It's Innistrad Block Constructed so i can't use those cards, but thanks for the advise. What i'm trying to do here but am too lazy to write in the description is that i wanna have almost all my creatures in my graveyard just one copy of each in my hand, i mill myself and then i play the Skaab from the graveyard or the splinterfright if it is in my hand. I changed the list a bit and put a Lab Maniac in case i over mill myself

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 04:55 in reply to #222241 on Innistrad Bock UG Skaab

Permalink

DoJ is gone. The Vault Skirge is there for the lifelink and are good cheap sword carriers. The inkmoth are for activation metalcraft and chump blocking. Added a Wurmcoil Engine

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 03:35 in reply to #220500 on Puresteel-Mentor Control

Permalink

Puts 1/1 Deathtouch Tokens, What would you take out for the Garruk?

0
Posted 17 October 2011 at 22:24 in reply to #207671 on Township Tokens

Permalink

True, Inkmoth Nexus is an auto-include but it's expensive. I would cosider adding a single dismember since most of the time dispatch is better. The etched champion's are the best in this deck so i wouldn't take any

0
Posted 04 October 2011 at 04:58 in reply to #204482 on Impuresteel

Permalink

Mirran is better against BG but geist is better against the rest (though is debatable, couse you lose double strike), so i wouldn't change it for the mirran. But i'm starting to think that the stalker is better probably because it's better to hit with a sword than tap an opponent's creatures

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 23:49 as a comment on Hero-Blade

Permalink

The thing about Invisible Stalker is that it's only good if equiped, and in this deck i would rather equip a hero or a geist or the sphinx, but it's a nice idea none the less. It could be -3 Gideon's Lawkeeper +3 Invisible Stalker, if a ever get the chance to test the deck.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 20:43 in reply to #203116 on Hero-Blade

Permalink

Corrected! It's black couse of the germ. Thanks. What do you think of the sideboard?

0
Posted 26 August 2011 at 18:33 in reply to #195546 on Modern Puresteel

Permalink

Thanks for your comment, thats a good SB, i'll put it in.

0
Posted 22 August 2011 at 04:46 in reply to #194374 on Venser Steel

Permalink

Good Deck!! Check out my UW Tapout Deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=221670

0
Posted 16 August 2011 at 21:00 as a comment on Taps

Permalink

And the blade splicer for double golem, and the suture priest for each time a creature comes in and out, and the stonehorn dignitary....

0
Posted 14 August 2011 at 22:43 in reply to #192130 on Venser Aggro

Permalink

stoneforge is banned in modern

0
Posted 14 August 2011 at 16:40 as a comment on Modern Puresteel/Swords

Permalink

Done...........

0
Posted 14 August 2011 at 15:25 in reply to #187416 on WW Puresteel

Permalink

+2 Spellskites main would be good at protecting your puresteels, and why only one sylvok and 6 creature removal spells, 4 dispatch aren't enough? That said, good deck.

0
Posted 08 August 2011 at 00:27 as a comment on GW puresteel

Permalink

I don't know if it's better 2 kemba or 2 hero of bladehold in this deck

0
Posted 07 August 2011 at 04:06 as a comment on UW Puresteel

Permalink

Good deck, but why not go full 4 hero of bladehold

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 04:07 as a comment on Hero Blade

Permalink

1-20 of 29 items

1 2 Last